Top 12 Sink or Swim

  • Thread starter DeletedUser54029
  • Start date

DeletedUser20914

Guest
and who said the common people in an alliance gets to hear/know what the leaders discuss ?
 

DeletedUser41523

Guest
What are you talking about?
I'm saying that you guys sure do brag a lot to teams that you begged to have the war end with less than a week ago. While collectively losing still last I checked...so personally I believe you're compensating for rejection.

Oh yeah sorry STORM, turns out SC valued an NAP or pact with winners more than you guys.
 

DeletedUser20914

Guest
i dont have to know, i dont have to be qualified.

and yet i am leader, shame shame shame
 

DeletedUser20914

Guest
I'm saying that you guys sure do brag a lot to teams that you begged to have the war end with less than a week ago. While collectively losing still last I checked...so personally I believe you're compensating for rejection.

Oh yeah sorry STORM, turns out SC valued an NAP or pact with winners more than you guys.

i heared that winners refused the nap becasue Sc wanted to include Storm


i can tell you, i am the most hated person in this server atm :(
 

DeletedUser54568

Guest
It's working because you have someone reporting you about all our moves :p Or you had... I think that person is gone now. But who knows, you might have others
 

DeletedUser48451

Guest
I'm saying that you guys sure do brag a lot to teams that you begged to have the war end with less than a week ago. While collectively losing still last I checked...so personally I believe you're compensating for rejection.

Oh yeah sorry STORM, turns out SC valued an NAP or pact with winners more than you guys.

You are simply fantastic TKF
smiley_emoticons_bravo2.gif
after all we all will come and eat your TRIPACT,on same side or not..am not going to discuss here who asked who for NAP or PACT cuz respect to Winners leadership but one is clear as hell,we will never have any type of agreement with you guys NEVER or maybe if your guys internalized you cuz bad leadership(big mouth),then maybe we can talk..
 

DeletedUser54568

Guest
Nex you may be respectful but not everyone in Stay leadership is... so that comment goes both ways...
 

DeletedUser54566

Guest
"I'm saying that you guys sure do brag a lot to teams that you begged to have the war end with less than a week ago. While collectively losing still last I checked...so personally I believe you're compensating for rejection.

Oh yeah sorry STORM, turns out SC valued an NAP or pact with winners more than you guys."

Hi Kitten, had been a while since I was around here on externals. Can you tell me what is it that you mean?

The talks Roni mentioned, "i heared that winners refused the nap becasue Sc wanted to include Storm", and yes you are right roni, were a month ago. I can assure you there has been nothing like that you mentioned mate
 

DeletedUser41523

Guest
i heared that winners refused the nap becasue Sc wanted to include Storm


i can tell you, i am the most hated person in this server atm :(

I can confirm that isn't the case. Feel free to chat me in game or on skype and i'll prove it if you don't take my word for it.

Otherwise the short answer is that they only considered it due to some misfiring on our end. And realizing that we were actually willing to work it out with them to prevent it from happening again and that SC would probably turn on them again if they ever got the clear upper hand, they opted to take an NAP with us instead and continue to fight SC. I had a chat with Warchuck about this on Saturday/Sunday.
 

DeletedUser54192

Guest
I'd like to see a new one as well. (I don't know enough about the overall goings-on to be able to make one, so please don't retort with a "do it yourself".)
 

DeletedUser47953

Guest
and who said the common people in an alliance gets to hear/know what the leaders discuss ?

and we don't tell anyone what the Warlords are planning in this alliance...

even my officers don't know most of the time... however, I occasionally tell my first or second mate what is going on...

I am the Cap'n, and if you don't like it, you can walk the plank.....

PS: my officers and scallywags trust me....

Edit: and they better, or I will chum the wake and throw them to the sharks...

Trust is important in an alliance, especially amongst Pirates... we have a Pirate Code...
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser31109

Guest
Top 10 Alliances : (COMPETITION FOR WW STATISTICS)

1. OSG4LIFE :
Seems that these guys have nothing to do now but start thinking about the World Wonders Islands. They have a pretty secure Ocean and ready to fight anywhere. SWIM for WW

2 Killer bunnies :
They seem to have a good core now, especially after they took few members from X SC.. They are also losing some good amount of cities to OSG. FLOAT for WW

3. OCEANS VETERANS :
Excellent Core on this alliance, a bit away from fights and know what they're doing. SWIM for WW

4. Winners :
Good bunch of people in the middle of all fights and doing excellent fights against everyone near them and not losing much cities. SWIM for WW

5. Old War Stories :
My own alliance so can't say much except Swim Like Micheal Philps

6. Turtle Time :
Seems to be getting smashed by OV and OSG, these guys need a fast solution. Sink for WW

7. Euphoria :
Good Core, but still losing good amount of cities to GOW, they seem to be safe from some deadly battles bad they have bad management. Float for WW

8. Smoking Nutters :
haha... Sink for WW

9. OSG Vanguard : CHECK 1


10. Winners 3 : Uhh shouldn't Winners 2 come here? anw Check 4



Hope you enjoy it. If you don't like it, it's ok.
 

DeletedUser41523

Guest
6. Turtle Time : Seems to be getting smashed by OV and OSG, these guys need a fast solution. Sink for WW.

This is news to me considering we lead OSG by 2 and have recently conquered some of their cities in their ocean...and OV is our ally...In fact the only team with an actual net gain on us right now is Waste Management and its by 3...
 

DeletedUser54539

Guest
Top 10 Alliances : (COMPETITION FOR WW STATISTICS)

4. Winners :
Good bunch of people in the middle of all fights and doing excellent fights against everyone near them and not losing much cities. SWIM for WW

Hope you enjoy it. If you don't like it, it's ok.

e4d30337fa56420b8bcd99aa04ebe725.png

This one is a Month Old.
af5d3fdeaaa8485dbc8b2bf3d49d73de.png

This one is two weeks Old Know.

You expect to see them do well during WWs.
 

DeletedUser54495

Guest
Nice top 12 good to get the forum going.

7. Euphoria : Good Core, but still losing good amount of cities to GOW, they seem to be safe from some deadly battles bad they have bad management. Float for WW

I liked this statement until i saw the word float. lol. And also I dunno what core your lookin at but theirs is pretty crappy
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser20914

Guest
lol i love how this guy (electrocuted) think himself knowledgeable hehehe
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser54192

Guest
Roni, please can you and Electrico keep your personal love-hate relationship to the trash talk thread or the PnPs? This is a top 12 thread. If you don't like his Top 12, then actually give some information on why he is wrong, or do your own Top 12 please. At least he did a Top 12, even if there are bits that I think are wrong. (As much as they are enemies of OSG, I'll admit that Turtle Time are definitely not looking like they will sink for WWs).
 
Top