DeletedUser
Guest
We have never taken a comprehensive look at the history of the war, from the parties who still exist today. This is not alliance v. alliance. This is Side v. Side. It is an interesting data set. I hope you guys enjoy my total boredom.
Alliances I consider active in this war:
Side 1
Ionian Legions
Ionian War Academy
Initiates of Ares
Disciples of Ares
The Black Huns
Ravens
(let me know if I missed anyone)
Side 2
Eaters of the Dead
Chaotic Eaters
Harbingers
Omen
Side 1 Losses
Ionian Legions - EotD/8 CE/0 Harb/1 Omen/1
Ionian War Academy - EotD/2 CE/3 Harb/7 Omen/2
Initiates of Ares - EotD/9 CE/2 Harb/7 Omen/0
Disciples of Ares - EotD/21 CE/0 Harb/6 Omen/0
The Black Huns - EotD/80 CE/2 Harb/159 Omen/1
Ravens - EotD/0 CE/0 Harb/1 Omen/1
Side 1 Gains
TBH - 351 RAVEN - 3 DOA - 121 IoA - 48 IL - 13 IWA - 4
Total gains - 450
Side 2 Losses
Eaters of the Dead - TBH/219 Ravens/1 DoA/36 IoA/14 IL/4 IWA/0
Chaotic Eaters - TBH/52 Ravens/2 DoA/10 IoA/27 IL/9 IWA/4
Harbingers - TBH/73 Ravens/0 DoA/74 IoA/7 IL/0 IWA/0
Omen - TBH/7 Ravens/0 DoA/1 IoA/0 IL/0 IWA/0
Side 2 Gains
EotD - 80 CE - 6 HARB - 181 OMEN - 5
Total Gains - 272
Total is 450 to 272 - 65% more conquers have done done on side1
Analysis of Players v. Conquers -
Side 1 - 563 players - 104,039,954 points - 38,057,821 ABP - 26,369,572 DBP - 9,841 villages
side 2 - 501 players - 66,757,420 points - 15,009,704 ABP - 11,494,939 DBP - 6,421 villages
The average side1 player has 184,795 points, 67,598 ABP, 46,837 DBP and 17.5 villages
The average side2 player has 133,248 points, 29,959ABP, 22,943 DBP and 12.8 villages
Which means the average side 1 player has 38% more points, 125% more ABP, 104% more DBP and 37% more villages.
Meaning, on average - taking these 4 key data points on hand - the average side1 player is 61% larger than the average side2 player.
The average player on side 1 is 61% larger than the average player on side 2 and side one has taken 65% more cities. That seems about right to me. Of course that is making the assumption all players are average and built the same. Of which we know not to be true. But such is a limitation of data of reality.
Based on the data sets - I would say everyone is fighting VERY hard and working their best. Side 1 has an advantage, largely it is their size. Which accounts for the increased city turn overs.
And before I get flamed to death - please be aware - this is solely data. This has nothing to do with reality. I am sure everyone in the world thinks they are doing better than everyone else in the world - and I am sure they are. But, as I said - that is the limitation of data. Using the data on hand, I did the best I could.
Alliances I consider active in this war:
Side 1
Ionian Legions
Ionian War Academy
Initiates of Ares
Disciples of Ares
The Black Huns
Ravens
(let me know if I missed anyone)
Side 2
Eaters of the Dead
Chaotic Eaters
Harbingers
Omen
Side 1 Losses
Ionian Legions - EotD/8 CE/0 Harb/1 Omen/1
Ionian War Academy - EotD/2 CE/3 Harb/7 Omen/2
Initiates of Ares - EotD/9 CE/2 Harb/7 Omen/0
Disciples of Ares - EotD/21 CE/0 Harb/6 Omen/0
The Black Huns - EotD/80 CE/2 Harb/159 Omen/1
Ravens - EotD/0 CE/0 Harb/1 Omen/1
Side 1 Gains
TBH - 351 RAVEN - 3 DOA - 121 IoA - 48 IL - 13 IWA - 4
Total gains - 450
Side 2 Losses
Eaters of the Dead - TBH/219 Ravens/1 DoA/36 IoA/14 IL/4 IWA/0
Chaotic Eaters - TBH/52 Ravens/2 DoA/10 IoA/27 IL/9 IWA/4
Harbingers - TBH/73 Ravens/0 DoA/74 IoA/7 IL/0 IWA/0
Omen - TBH/7 Ravens/0 DoA/1 IoA/0 IL/0 IWA/0
Side 2 Gains
EotD - 80 CE - 6 HARB - 181 OMEN - 5
Total Gains - 272
Total is 450 to 272 - 65% more conquers have done done on side1
Analysis of Players v. Conquers -
Side 1 - 563 players - 104,039,954 points - 38,057,821 ABP - 26,369,572 DBP - 9,841 villages
side 2 - 501 players - 66,757,420 points - 15,009,704 ABP - 11,494,939 DBP - 6,421 villages
The average side1 player has 184,795 points, 67,598 ABP, 46,837 DBP and 17.5 villages
The average side2 player has 133,248 points, 29,959ABP, 22,943 DBP and 12.8 villages
Which means the average side 1 player has 38% more points, 125% more ABP, 104% more DBP and 37% more villages.
Meaning, on average - taking these 4 key data points on hand - the average side1 player is 61% larger than the average side2 player.
The average player on side 1 is 61% larger than the average player on side 2 and side one has taken 65% more cities. That seems about right to me. Of course that is making the assumption all players are average and built the same. Of which we know not to be true. But such is a limitation of data of reality.
Based on the data sets - I would say everyone is fighting VERY hard and working their best. Side 1 has an advantage, largely it is their size. Which accounts for the increased city turn overs.
And before I get flamed to death - please be aware - this is solely data. This has nothing to do with reality. I am sure everyone in the world thinks they are doing better than everyone else in the world - and I am sure they are. But, as I said - that is the limitation of data. Using the data on hand, I did the best I could.