Mission: Revive Ephesus: Rate the Player Above You!

DeletedUser

Guest
Mission: To Revive Ephesus Forum

The Game

Rate the Player above you on these criteria

InGame Persona (is the player a good player/bad player?) x/10
Alliance Persona (Is the player's alliance a good alliance/bad alliance?) x/10
Forum Persona (how much of a spamma is the player/Forum noob?) x/10
Do you personally like him/her? x/10
Overall/Average x/10

FOR EXAMPLE

Free SCV
InGame=8/10 ~ Good Solid player, skillfull
Alliance=1/10 ~ Massive MRA (has 8 sub alliances for god's sake)
Forum=5/10 ~ Not really involved much, but comes up with good points/arguments
Likeable= 9/10 ~ Nice guy, just very easily manipulated by his evil twin
Overall=23/40
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser

Guest
wavebreaker and C.D.C are only recent entrants into Grepo's War's on this serve, but they've been around a good while so that'll be how I have to look at their marking.

InGame=6/10 ~ Only 1 active conquest in a war. More defense then attacking points. Will rise in time
Alliance=7/10 ~Only getting into wars. Solid, well held together, well lead, no real losses yet
Forum=10/10 ~ Lifes blood of the forum
Likeable= 9/10 ~Of course
Overall=32/40
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Ill rate you, but it would defeat the purpose of only having a few players rating each other.

InGame: 8/10 Strong player
Alliance: 8/10 Solid Alliance
Forum: 8/10 Active in Ephesus Forum
Likeable: 10/10 Very likeable :)
Overall: 34/40
 

DeletedUser

Guest
wavebreaker and C.D.C are now getting properly active in Grepo's War's

InGame=8/10 ~ I knew he'd rise. But doing better then expected
Alliance=8/10 ~Leave the unaligned cities alone lads, there's enemies to fight.
Forum=10/10 ~ again Lifes blood of the forum
Likeable= 10/10 ~Of course
Overall=36/40
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Umm I could do you again... But that would be pointless.
 
Link of time

Link of time

Phrourach
WAVEBREAKER

InGame= 4/10 ~Tends to fight wars with words.
Alliance= 3/10 ~ something missing like, that player that holds the alliance together.
Forum= 6/10 ~ Makes good ideas but sometimes annoying.
Likeable= 5/10
Overall= 18/40
 
Last edited:

DeletedUser

Guest
Link of time

InGame = 2/10 ~ C'mon, 8000 points total and barely 1000 BP?
Alliance = 3/10 ~ I never liked MRAs
Forum = 2/10 ~ I realize that these games have forum performance artists, but they usually have established their in-game credibility first
Likeability = 4/10 ~ Basically inoffensive
Overall = 11/40 ~ Come back when you've grown up.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Link of time said:
WAVEBREAKER

InGame= 4/10 ~Tends to fight wars with words.
Alliance= 3/10 ~ Gaping hole because of the band system (without 5/10)
Forum= 6/10 ~ Makes good ideas but sometimes annoying.
Likeable= 5/10
Overall= 18/40
Click to expand...

InGame= 0/10 ~ Prefers not to fight wars at all, only bolts players. Minimal defense. Bob player. Has a pathetically small amount of BP. Never attacks anyone.
Alliance= 2/10 ~ MRA.
Forum= 1/10 ~ Quality of posts, not quantity of posts.
Likeable= 0/10 ~ He's a noob who rants at me InGame, and rants at me in this Forum. Has never done anything to make me like him, and has infact infuriated me on several occasions. Also enjoys lying about my alliance, refer to below
Overall= 3/40

WE DON'T HAVE A BLOODY BAND SYSTEM. BAND SYSTEM WAS TEMPORARY FOR 1 WEEK ONLY, WHILE INTERNAL CLEAR-UPS WE'RE ONGOING. THAT WAS ROUGHLY 2-3 MONTHS AGO.

I don't mind you lying about me, but never lie about my alliance you njub.

jmkdunwoody said:
Link of time

InGame = 2/10 ~ C'mon, 8000 points total and barely 1000 BP?
Alliance = 3/10 ~ I never liked MRAs
Forum = 2/10 ~ I realize that these games have forum performance artists, but they usually have established their in-game credibility first
Likeability = 4/10 ~ Basically inoffensive
Overall = 11/40 ~ Come back when you've grown up.
Click to expand...

InGame= 9/10 Solid Player, high levels of BP.
Alliance= 9/10 Solid Alliance, refer to Top 12 Alliance Thread
Forum= 4/10 Never seen him before, but 3 rep bars. Anyways nice to see a new face once in a while :)
Likeable= 8/10 His Hatred of MRAs makes me want to hug him :p
Overall= 32/40
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser

Guest
MRAs never last.

I don't post much on the forums; StillSetanta has much more of a stomach for it than I do, but every once in awhile I intervene.
 
Link of time

Link of time

Phrourach
Jmkdunwoody
InGame= 4/10~ really don't know anything about him.
Alliance= 8/10~ i like his alliance.
Forum= 2/10~ first time i ever seen him, hie is hurling insuts at me. What a great way to start off.
Likeable= 4/10~ I don't know anything, i just know he likes BP.:D
Overall= 18/40~
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Talk less, play more. Earn your credibility. I've been playing with StillSetanta in two worlds for three years. He's my standard for a warrior and a forum personality. The former comes first.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Dude, don't worry about Link of time rating you. He feels all experienced players, like myself, are no better than a 4. He gave me a 4 too.

Jmkdunwoody

WAVEBREAKER said:
InGame= 9/10 Solid Player, high levels of BP.
Alliance= 9/10 Solid Alliance, refer to Top 12 Alliance Thread
Forum= 4/10 Never seen him before, but 3 rep bars. Anyways nice to see a new face once in a while
Likeable= 8/10 His Hatred of MRAs makes me want to hug him
Overall= 32/40
Click to expand...

That is your true rating, from an unbiased source.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
You barely know anyone in Ephesus... There is no way you can know everyone.

Basically you are only going to give people in your alliance above 4?
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Link of time said:
No... i'm not giving my enemy or a guy that hurled insults at me above a four.

Back on topic
Click to expand...
Well isn't it good that none of us value your opinion then? It works out for everyone. You get to rant and attempt to derail the thrend by not taking it in the spirit it's supposed to be taken in and we all get to ignore you.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
I'm going to pass on rating link as I am in OSG and I don't think I would be objective so I will rank StillSetanta instead.

InGame= 8/10 Have never spoken with this player personally but have heard nothing but praise for their leadership abilities, however, the attacker/defender/and overall rankings are under top 100 so had to deduct 2 points there.

Alliance= 9/10 Great alliance with which I respect for their record of achievements (especially against HaP), would give a 10/10 but its not my alliance so hard to do that lol

Forum= 10/10 Always posts reasonably and is very civil

Likeable= 9/10 Don't know persoanlly, but again hear only good things about StillSetanta from players I trust.

Overall= 36/40

Just on a side note: I think its funny how everyone on public forums says OSG group is a MRA. Because I know we have pretty much cut off recruiting outside of our academy (but everyone does that). We're pretty much going through and determining which players are active and will be in for the long run, which is what CDC is doing now too.

FYI, OSG BK was never an OSG alliance it was merely the inactive Bloodlust Knights we planned to take over after merge, but we were smart enough not to make them allainceless cities that would be immediately attacked by our enemies :). I think it worked out well.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top