DeletedUser43592
Guest
I disagree with my colleague, math20. The game is the game, whether we like it or not as opponents won, their merit is indisputable.
No alliance can take the crown without a good organization.
Analyzes made here are relevant and flattering for BnS.
VIC was not ready for wonders. The right word is "amateur". Their decisions was blocked by too many leaders. VIC refusal to join BnS, only chance to try to stop BV, has shown that they do not know how conducted the fights in WW age.
Of course, I could accept the five players from VIC who understood it and wanted to join us.
But how long I will be in the lead BnS, I will not tolerate lack of fair play to allies or adversaries. Regardless of how it should proceed allies or opponents.
No alliance can take the crown without a good organization.
Analyzes made here are relevant and flattering for BnS.
VIC was not ready for wonders. The right word is "amateur". Their decisions was blocked by too many leaders. VIC refusal to join BnS, only chance to try to stop BV, has shown that they do not know how conducted the fights in WW age.
Of course, I could accept the five players from VIC who understood it and wanted to join us.
But how long I will be in the lead BnS, I will not tolerate lack of fair play to allies or adversaries. Regardless of how it should proceed allies or opponents.
Last edited by a moderator: