DeletedUser
Guest
I'd want a 3/3 conquest. Might be looking to be a regular soldier for someone.
Same but revolt. I really don't enjoy conquest anymore.
I'd want a 3/3 conquest. Might be looking to be a regular soldier for someone.
Look at it this way:
Speed 1:
Pros-
-Longer lasting
-harder to get rimmed
-longer CS siege time ( Easier to snipe and more leeching time)
-longer friendships
-more players=more cities to take
Cons:
-Slow
-If you mess up, then it takes forever to rebuild troops
Game speed 2:
Pros:
-Manageable for most
-medium world time
-easier to conquer cities
Cons
-less players
-world ends faster
Speed 3:
Pros:
-fast
-exciting
-less Tim to conquer cities
Cons-
-youll be rimmed faster than you'll gain cities
-you'll have no life
-gold is heavily used here
-world usually ends in 6 months
that is not an impartial veiw if ever i saw one
all server have gold whore who use loads of gold all servers are fun and you make long lasting freindships all server speeds have there benifits and pitfalls. they are all the same essentialy just twists on a theme
So you are saying, unlimited gold can help you with WW..
This is coming from someone who has spent the last 11 months defending his alliance leader who is the biggest gold shark in the game saying it doesnt give him an advantage..
So "IF" Hert win en70, its because Eriks (and others) excessive gold useage helped them with WW.. thanks for that
Hey, if you want to play right, then alliance cap 40-60I say it is about time for a new world to come around. Probably a S or T name.
Speed 1 (There hasnt been a speed one for a while)
Unit Speed 2 (Seems like that is the normal thing)
Alliance cap- 150-200 range (Hasnt been a high cap for a while)
Beginner protection- 5 days
Revolt world
Morale enabled
*Note these are just estimates based off what has happened with the last several worlds.
I have 125 archers why can I only send 122 in battle