40 Player Alliance Limit (Thoughts??)

DeletedUser39190

Guest
I thought the cap on the last world I won was great because of how small it was (80 Players on US43), but this, wow, it's AMAZING

There are going to be some VERY elite alliances that wont be dragged down by huge MRAs, but I can guarantee you there will be that one alliance...

MRA, MRA2, MRA3, MRA4, MRA5, MRA6, MRA7...

Ugh
 

DeletedUser29066

Guest
I like smaller cap. If I ever decide to play again I'll look for a world with a cap of no more than around 75 max, preferably 40-50. Of course someone always has to ruin it by having several grouped alliances with similar names.
 

DeletedUser31385

Guest
Smaller is better. 150+ is horrible and I do not prefer 100.
 

DeletedUser17748

Guest
50 is always a good mix, i find 40 slightly small for my liking. :)
 

DeletedUser25589

Guest
I don't see anything wrong with bigger-alliance servers. It's all about how the leaders manage their alliance.
It's definitely easier to properly coordinate and manage a smaller alliance, though.
 

DeletedUser51376

Guest
I like it, but as people said here, I would prefer 50-60 instead.


I think anything between 50-70 is ideal
 

DeletedUser15834

Guest
The smaller the better if you ask me.
It means there is no room for deadweight.
Also it means you get a good years fighting before the dreaded endgame ruins the world.
 

DeletedUser51005

Guest
I like the small alliance cap. Should make for some intresting wars.
 

DeletedUser51219

Guest
Yeah same here it makes it harder for MRAs to survive not that they normally do anyways lol
 

DeletedUser30517

Guest
Yea, 40 is good for a world. Makes for better fights for control. My personal fav is 50 though.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
As JKybett said, I don't mind bigger alliances but leadership need to be great.
It will be a bigger number of wars this way.
 
Top