DeletedUser
Guest
Lol Tart
Probably as a runaway Tart you will never understand this:
If both sides are equal,targeting just inactives would be shameful.
Was this the case?
The fact is that so far STYX has won the battle with EN,gaining much more ground then EN/OCC
In the last month STYX(without -STYX-) has 950k abp.A bit too much for turtles,right Tart?
And we did not have inactives to clear in STYX.
Is it not shameful for you justifying every loss with conn problems or inactivity?
Is it not true that in the last 45 days EN never targeted one of the most active players of STYX but concentrated on weaker players?Shades,Limbo,Trime,Mushy(with the exception of his ex Tarts mates)?
We sustained the best possible strategy,alternating between active/halfactive and inactive targets.
And results were great.First we created some bases,then added them with patience,right in your middle,while you were unable to make the whole alliance to hit us.
Your suggestions are just kiddish,what do you want us to do?Leave ghosts and EN inactives to EN?(Now Misfits)
What do you call fair Tart,attacking after a warning of the kind:Hey,we are going to attack you in X hour of X day?
As you yourself admitted EN did not give even a formal warning for breaking a pact,even a single hour,capitalizing on surprise.
And you still think we have been unfair?
We granted immunity to an EN player while you tart,you yourself,targeted our inactives exactly same time.
Futile to try and make "the victor".You were just feeling the heat.In the last month it was practically STYX versus EN/OCC,yet we got more cities then you,and for example,saxmaster was not inactive,is he?
Just cut the and go in Helorus.
You are the past now,and not a glorious one
Take lol bella with you
Probably as a runaway Tart you will never understand this:
If both sides are equal,targeting just inactives would be shameful.
Was this the case?
The fact is that so far STYX has won the battle with EN,gaining much more ground then EN/OCC
In the last month STYX(without -STYX-) has 950k abp.A bit too much for turtles,right Tart?
And we did not have inactives to clear in STYX.
Is it not shameful for you justifying every loss with conn problems or inactivity?
Is it not true that in the last 45 days EN never targeted one of the most active players of STYX but concentrated on weaker players?Shades,Limbo,Trime,Mushy(with the exception of his ex Tarts mates)?
We sustained the best possible strategy,alternating between active/halfactive and inactive targets.
And results were great.First we created some bases,then added them with patience,right in your middle,while you were unable to make the whole alliance to hit us.
Your suggestions are just kiddish,what do you want us to do?Leave ghosts and EN inactives to EN?(Now Misfits)
What do you call fair Tart,attacking after a warning of the kind:Hey,we are going to attack you in X hour of X day?
As you yourself admitted EN did not give even a formal warning for breaking a pact,even a single hour,capitalizing on surprise.
And you still think we have been unfair?
We granted immunity to an EN player while you tart,you yourself,targeted our inactives exactly same time.
Futile to try and make "the victor".You were just feeling the heat.In the last month it was practically STYX versus EN/OCC,yet we got more cities then you,and for example,saxmaster was not inactive,is he?
Just cut the and go in Helorus.
You are the past now,and not a glorious one
Take lol bella with you