DeletedUser
Guest
I am almost 40. And a teacher. So very grumpy indeed god greenmonkey.
i'm 17, 11th grade, robbyn what do you teach?
I am almost 40. And a teacher. So very grumpy indeed god greenmonkey.
I'm teaching logic.
And iga, skall is 70ish only on weekends.
logic??
you mean computer programming logic?? or something else?
Nope. Just logic, one of the oldest humanistic sciences.
Nope. Just logic, one of the oldest humanistic sciences.
hihihi, i like it
p → q, p ˅ ˥p, q ˅ p, (r ˅ p) ˄ (q ˅ r), ˥p ˅ q
is this conclusion valid? or not?
90
Nah just joking, but seeing as your an army veteran (I think...well, I hope ), I'd say around 50-60?
The conclusion can be true or false, but not valid. The argument can be valid or not.
90
Nah just joking, but seeing as your an army veteran (I think...well, I hope ), I'd say around 50-60?
Is this your argument?
{(p → q) & (p V ˥p) & (q V p) & [(r V p) & (q V r)]} → (˥p V q)
If yes, the argument is valid. This means that if the premises are true, then the conclusion is true as well.
premises
∀x(Ax → Bx), ∀x(Cx → ˥Dx), ∀x(Ex → Ax), ∀x(Bx → ˥Fx), ∀x(˥Ex → Cx)
conclusion
∀x(Fx → ˥Dx)
90? Rofl... In my 20's... Oh and it was USMC by the way... Not to be confused with the Army... I know all of the armed forces get chalked up together, but it makes a difference to the people who were in...