DeletedUser
Guest
nah, but maybe try to have some fun is all i'm saying if your idea of having fun involves toughing it out until the enemy quits and then building a 120 city empire then that's cool.How boring. I guess we should all give up now, huh?
i guess i just have this naive image of an action-packed world where fun counts for more than survival. (kinda like the beginning of kappa i guess, only even better! O.O)
yeah, most of them have played together before and been the best alliance. that is obviously my opinion, because i have this crazy idea that an alliance who wins every war they're involved in until they reach a point where the fun starts to dwindle is the best alliance.I do not doubt that they have some of the best players but that dosen't mean they are the best alliance, thats just your definition of it.
differing opinions again i guess. in my opinion an alliance that tops a world after 2 years because any semblance of competition has long since quit only shows that they have a higher boredom threshold. if that is greatness then...For many of us here the factor of longetivity comes into our judgement of best alliance. For example, Grepohugs on gamma, dominated the world from day 1 and still dominated every ranking and thats over two years ago. they are the best alliance because of that. Any alliance that sticks around for a couple of months is good, but is no where near the best.
that's not grepohugs ofc, since they were there to start with too. a fantastic legacy . sounds a bit like you're throwing a few subtle stabs at PV too (obv not because of your failure in that world, sour grapes would never come into the equation i'm sure). i'd personally rate PV up there with them even though PV is long gone. to put it simply, PV had a lofty goal and achieved it emphatically. once the server was dead, PV left. does that make them a poorer alliance for not simply logging in every few days until 2 years had elapsed and they were still top? matter of opinion i guess...
the ability to 'stick it out' is definitely an advantage EN has over the pinks, so you EN is looking to be #1 after 2yrs then i'd say you've got a fantastic chance of 'coming out on top'. i just think if it were me it'd feel like a very hollow victory knowing that you're only there because the pinks already achieved their victory of dominating until 1m ABP or taking all 4 core oceans or simply getting too bored - or whatever it may be (which i would say is prob around 90% likely to happen)Thats why EN will come out on top. we know how to stick it out. Have you not recognised some of the names here and seen how long they have been around in a particular world for? Probably not since pro's dont play morale worlds right.
Last edited by a moderator: