DeletedUser
Guest
it will help people that are low points, gain faster it also will have a lock so it is not over used
it will help people that are low points, gain faster
it also will have a lock so it is not over used
i dont see this as necessary to be honest and i can't see how it would improve the game. It would also be a monumental task for the leaders to assign each player an amount they could take out when you have alliances with 200 members.
Also I haven't actually seen a decent reason why this would enhance the game, just lots of comments saying why not...
What benefits does this have to justify such a massive change to the game dynamics?
Why not get another city and upgrade the warehouse TAHDAH
but then you have to use those resources for upgradding that city and building troops there duh.
but then you have to use those resources for upgradding that city and building troops there duh.
what I see is large players, will not donating but, instead make the most withdraws.
the writing is on the wall. large MRA goes to war vs normal 40 man alliance larger players say are cities are built for massive troops your (smaller members) not at our level yet. they ask every small player to give a few resources.
this will not help the avg. to small players nor will it help the normal to small alliance this is made to tax the smaller players of a MRA. with a Disclaimer spin of helping the smaller player
I would like to see a city cap like if you have more then 10 cities you can't withdraw from this warehouse or something like that so it has a chance of helping those intended.