I can agree with this, did not factor cities per player/cities per allianceHi wabberjack,
I think I see the point you are making (ie. you suggest NN are better because they make more Conquests per player), however I don't think it's valid. Its a lot easier for a big player to make a conquest over a smaller player, because they have a lot more assets to play with and its easier to coordinate them.
I wouldn't expect someone with 10 cities to make as many conquests against a 30 city player, as a 30 city player would make against a 10 city player !? (which is effectively what your 'conquests per player' measure is suggesting).
I think a fairer measure (to both sides) is the ratio of conquests to the number of cities available to make the conquests (because number of cities is a better measure of potential military force, than number of players is).
- MoRC 38 for 1645 alliance cities = 2.31%
- NN 15 for 1499 alliance cities = 1.00%
View attachment 4470