DeletedUser20415
Guest
who is talking about gold, lol I buyed gold one time, to try them out of curiosity, but I would LOVE to see a server without gold using, one vs one !!
Milos - at what point did I even mention gold.
Out of curiosity what would your values say about a player who says
" I would rather delete my account than build WW"
and then goes on to build them.
Or a server were you could only spend gold like you could before grepo 2.0
who is talking about gold, lol I buyed gold one time, to try them out of curiosity, but I would LOVE to see a server without gold using, one vs one !!
I was right and they were wrong- Milos21
The problem in that area is defining "best". The PB/Milos concept seems to be:- set up a premade - get in early so they are bigger better badder than everyone else - bish bash bosh 2 months world over - presumably so they can "lord" it over everyone else
(something PB excelled at in the early days - with the likes of daizan etc).
The problem with that concept is the world will be decided by how good your premade is - something that happens even before the world starts (so hardly qualifies as the best in my book) - combined with who can play grepolis on the go - which all depends on whether youre allowed to play it at work. No surprise then that many consider both adasko and snoops as the best players (Im led to believe they both have their own companies). Equally we have the likes of CH (and according to rumour lockthor) - I dont think I need to explain that one do I?
In the early days PB were despised not because of their ability but because of their sheer arrogance - like little boys peeking out from behind Socrates. I thought the way Nicossia in particular was hounded out by some of the comments on here was particulary distasteful.
Dont get me wrong I have nothing but realistic admiration for Socrates but the PB rhetoric was of course the usual drivel.
Now of course that arrogance has quite frankly turned to sour grapes. IF PB (sorry TU) had built the WW first Im quite sure these forums would be full of their wonderful accomplishment yet the only 2 threads started on here were by Richard and Farg neither of whom has anything to do with TS.
So far in the various threads on here since WW I have heard PB wish to dictate the alliance cap size -where we can build WW - how we play - what we can do - what we cant do- Ive even heard suggestion as to who we can pact with ~ sigh.
(no mention of reapers death dealers dzikie hordie angry apples OV TU etc because thats PB pacts so its ok)
So basically the arrogance of PB are the "best" has changed to bleating of "its not fair"
Seriously you need to get over it cuz it does you no credit.
This time we won - next time you might - thats how it goes
Hilop
First premade with half decent players to join up will be in the core -
and once ahead will likely remain dominant for a long period
so 2 months after that it would be pointless joining.
Ironically Im not a fan of WW but if thats the winning criteria then thats what I will base my strategy on
just the same as all the other criterias - alliance cap - morale etc etc.
With regard to *adasko* being the best attacker sorry but I cant agree with that one.
Most active attacker - yes probably. His style was more quantity over quality -
but if being the "best" attacker is defined by ABP alone then yes.
If it was a one on one with socrates gpax or *adasko* I know who I would pick
With regard to Milos being the best leader - its difficult to tell if youre not in that alliance
but kudos to him for keeping PB dominant despite the loss of Soc etc
and for making it at least an entertaining world
Its pointless to join server outside the first 3 months. 80% of fun is first 3 months. I can not imagine playing the server already formed. I played that game once or twice and its not fun at all. Half of players around you are not even fighting.
I strongly disagree on that mate. In life and in game, people should do their best and do what they think its right. If you do what Inno suggets, you will never develop your own way of thinking, fighting etc.
I despise gold and taking money in that way. I am OK with commercials and ads, but paying for playing is not what Grepolis should be about.
So,I play without any gold (I did take 2300 free gold on Christmas event bug).
So, you are saying that I should obey Inno system, take my credit card and pay to be competitive? Nope mate. I say lets do right things, things the way we see them, lets improve the Grepo, the externals and change things.
Lets improve the WW system instead of following it without thinking.
I would be very sad man if I dont play the same way I do things in RL.
WE CAN CHANGE THINGS IF WE DO OUR BEST, without thinking what others will say or do.
Adasko is one of the most active players I have ever seen. I wont even try to dispute that. He is 5 times more online than myself.
but soc and original gpax have something else that you like about players. A social dimension.
I like attackers, I must admit that. But I love people behind play skills more.
And you think winner would be the alliance which builds WWs faster? Really?
Actually all my strategy games, online or single player I play them as conquest as win condition.
WW is the winner of the world, that is not me saying that is the grepo server saying, but again they cant put the world for final conquest because then the world will take 10 years to close, just me saying.
The problem in that area is defining "best". The PB/Milos concept seems to be:- set up a premade - get in early so they are bigger better badder than everyone else - bish bash bosh 2 months world over - presumably so they can "lord" it over everyone else
(something PB excelled at in the early days - with the likes of daizan etc).
The problem with that concept is the world will be decided by how good your premade is - something that happens even before the world starts (so hardly qualifies as the best in my book) - combined with who can play grepolis on the go - which all depends on whether youre allowed to play it at work. No surprise then that many consider both adasko and snoops as the best players (Im led to believe they both have their own companies). Equally we have the likes of CH (and according to rumour lockthor) - I dont think I need to explain that one do I?
In the early days PB were despised not because of their ability but because of their sheer arrogance - like little boys peeking out from behind Socrates. I thought the way Nicossia in particular was hounded out by some of the comments on here was particulary distasteful.
Dont get me wrong I have nothing but realistic admiration for Socrates but the PB rhetoric was of course the usual drivel.
Now of course that arrogance has quite frankly turned to sour grapes. IF PB (sorry TU) had built the WW first Im quite sure these forums would be full of their wonderful accomplishment yet the only 2 threads started on here were by Richard and Farg neither of whom has anything to do with TS.
So far in the various threads on here since WW I have heard PB wish to dictate the alliance cap size -where we can build WW - how we play - what we can do - what we cant do- Ive even heard suggestion as to who we can pact with ~ sigh.
(no mention of reapers death dealers dzikie hordie angry apples OV TU etc because thats PB pacts so its ok)
So basically the arrogance of PB are the "best" has changed to bleating of "its not fair"
Seriously you need to get over it cuz it does you no credit.
This time we won - next time you might - thats how it goes
I rarely read anything longer than 10 lines ^.^!