DeletedUser
Guest
Hello to everyone again ! 
I'm not sure that I'll know as many people on the forums as I did before my break from the game. But hey I'm Matty if you don't know me.
I joined a world to have a warm up, get back into the game, get some more timing practise etc. I joining Olynthus, and joined a small alliance called Bloodguard. I like to think that even though I'm not the best of players, I know the game quite well, and I know what to do. I met a player who I won't name, and he disagrees with my tactics entirely, and as a result, he argues day after day about which tactic is best. So I'll put it to everyone here, as I'm interested to know which is the best tactic.
He thinks that the best tactic is to keep all your cities to one or two islands, and he has the philosophy of building cities from scratch, and I quote, he believes people who would then take his cities are 'scumbags'.
I disagree with everything that he is saying about the game. I believe that you never limit yourself to a number of islands, you should expand as much as you can, and I believe taking cities off people like him, is the point of the game.
So what does everyone think? I would like to also say that his tactics do not differ in any circumstance, they stay the same through every scenario, although if I was likely to be attacked often and hard in a small alliance, I would keep my cities closer together, whereas he does all of the time.
Interested to hear peoples thoughts... It may also settle our little dispute.
Thanks
Matty
I'm not sure that I'll know as many people on the forums as I did before my break from the game. But hey I'm Matty if you don't know me.
I joined a world to have a warm up, get back into the game, get some more timing practise etc. I joining Olynthus, and joined a small alliance called Bloodguard. I like to think that even though I'm not the best of players, I know the game quite well, and I know what to do. I met a player who I won't name, and he disagrees with my tactics entirely, and as a result, he argues day after day about which tactic is best. So I'll put it to everyone here, as I'm interested to know which is the best tactic.
He thinks that the best tactic is to keep all your cities to one or two islands, and he has the philosophy of building cities from scratch, and I quote, he believes people who would then take his cities are 'scumbags'.
I disagree with everything that he is saying about the game. I believe that you never limit yourself to a number of islands, you should expand as much as you can, and I believe taking cities off people like him, is the point of the game.
So what does everyone think? I would like to also say that his tactics do not differ in any circumstance, they stay the same through every scenario, although if I was likely to be attacked often and hard in a small alliance, I would keep my cities closer together, whereas he does all of the time.
Interested to hear peoples thoughts... It may also settle our little dispute.
Thanks
Matty