Combining attacks?

[Unreichvelt]

I dont just mean attacking people at the same time, i mean literally combining attacks. When you attack with even 93 manti, against an army with the support of 1000 manti and 15k archers as well as 27k swordsmen? Thats INSANE and you could send wave after wave of attack and get nowhere, however if you could combine troops or set a limit on the amount of troops from allies you can hold more cities would be able to be taken? Seeing as how instead of 93 manti if you have say a "Rally" attack or if you just time the attack to the same second so you attack at the same time then you stand a much better chance. As well as if you cap the support, it makes it much much easier to take a city rather than having to face a billion troops with an army a fraction the size.

 

[xFate]

@Spartan AD are manti's a good support unit? You would know

 

[Rurick]

This is basic concept of the game. If you change it, it would be another game. So "combine" armies before CS arrived in your city, that possible.

 

[Lethal-Bacon]

This is basic concept of the game. If you change it, it would be another game. So "combine" armies before CS arrived in your city, that possible.

its dumb, if you would be able to move ls nukes from 1 city to another and make it 660 ls instead of two separate 330 ls nukes and so on with any unit type, it would be impossible to snipe or defend or illogical

 

[DeletedUser54755]

its dumb, if you would be able to move ls nukes from 1 city to another and make it 660 ls instead of two separate 330 ls nukes and so on with any unit type, it would be impossible to snipe or defend or illogical

Also imagine zeus rage/sea storming they would be insane