DeletedUser
Guest
Lol... im enjoying reading dalmasio's posts... lucid and well written... and the content rocks..
At what point in any of the messages was it made clear that he was a founder? As I am not all-knowing I did not know, simple. With regards to him not being "not high enough to speak to" yeah, you're correct. But as I was unaware he was not a founder and I just figured he was an uncooperative diplo - my bad
However, if the founder of your own alliance refuses to acknowledge players as refugees then I have no idea where the problem is with regards to us dropping the pact I think you will find on all worlds the refugee policy is consistent and any other alliance would do the same.
As it all comes out - we see that The Enlightened did not back-stab anyone.
Why can't everyone just get along?
gotta say i love how much attention this thread has gotten
Shame no-one is talking about my fun picture though
Now see thats the kind of thing i was looking for a very good very clear statement of what happened, if you'd simply talked about DN taking in refugees to begin with we could have all seen exactly what was going on.
Taking in refugees like WoE is one thing, they were allies and their enemies aren't really worthy of note. But taking in refugees from an unfriendly alliance which is also at war with one of your pact members really is a bad idea.
Thanks for clearing that up for me dalmasio
Clearing this up? Scully, if all you wanted was Dalmasios side of the story, why didn't you just mail him in game? I think it's hilarious that you listen to one thing he says, and you're satisfied.
Also, Dalmasio, can you explain to me your definition of a refugee please?
According to grepostats, Riverjon lost 1 city to BW on 7/27, then he took a city from BW on 8/08, another on 8/21, THEN, he joined DN on 8/23, and then he took an enlightened city on 8/25 (which is in ocean 34, that we have no agreement on) So he took 2 cities from BW and lost one to BW. So, by my definition, he is not a refugee to any alliance, ESPECIALLY TE.
As far as battle reports go, show them to me since you claim you have them.
hamster360;449815I said:f these 2 players were actual refugees I believe that TE and BW with a combined 1000+ cities could have taken more than one city from them.
ALSO, when you provide these reports, can you make sure that this time they are of TE attacks, and not BW reports.
You are after all claiming that Riverjon and Bunny are refugees of TE. Unless you are the puppetmaster of BW?
Unless you are the puppetmaster of BW?
DN can attack in any direction!