DeletedUser
Guest
I love a good moan
Yes we kick inactive players under attack rather than defend them, seems pretty logical to me, we keep them for internal takeovers, but once they're being taken by our enemies there is no need...
Tactics? I'm sorry but when have you seen me personally message Grant? I would dearly love to see them. I'm sure anything he has received from NmE members (which is what I believe you were referring to) was gamesmanship. I find it interesting that those who contribute regularly are an equal or even lesser priority than others.
But yeah keep up your bolting you're really helping me enjoy the game
I bet you do
Just a second.I didn't say inactive member after he starts loosing cities,but ACTIVE....But no need to go into this subject as I don't have neither time nor will to discuss it with you.You have your ways we have ours and that is it.I don't think we would be first if we are doing something wrong here?
And have I said that you mailed him PERSONALLY?!I don't see that part of my message?I said your alliance is using that tactic and ok if you like it go for it.But once players see the might of Dacian Wall and our solidarity when it comes to defend one of our own they hadly ever consider leaving Dacia.
And one more thing before I end.If the bolts weren't supposed to be used in game there wouldn't have been an option 'bolt your opponent' So sit bac enjoy and spend those resources