Inactive Topic Dissolve alliance

DeletedUser22235

Guest
Improvement Dissolve alliance

Discription
It a small idee for one but rather bigg idea for a alliance.
When there are 2 ore more with Founder Rights.
Each founder needs to approved to the Dissolve of alliance .

Format
This will improve a lot of thing.
Alliance will faster merge.
Develop trust in a alliance without the fear to get Disolved.

The reason i posted this idee,
I'v been there and had that.
No player likes to wake and see there top alliance getting dissolved.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser23986

Guest
NOT USEFUL

A founder may remove other founders, so i don;t see how it will work.
 

DeletedUser22235

Guest
NOT USEFUL

A founder may remove other founders, so i don;t see how it will work.

True a founder may remove a other founder.
Maybe if it is possible is to set a min time that needs to pass when removing a founder before it's able to Dissolve it. Ore a req of min 2 Founders. Ore a approventen whit one alliance leader. Ore voting by the foundr(s) and leader(s).
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser

Guest
Founders should have already agreed to dissolve an alliance, so this is basicly stopping spies.
 

DeletedUser22235

Guest
Founders should have already agreed to dissolve an alliance, yes.
This is basicly stopping spies, no.
It happened to the alliance in the world where we still play. (chi)
We did merge whit a alliance, one of the founders wend bannanas end disoveld it.
His asword was someone took my claim :eek:.
I hope no alliance will go trough this.
I know it is not the best idee, but think about it i could happen to anyone.
Most if not all know what happen to Titans Of Tartarus on Chi.
 

DeletedUser23986

Guest
But he may still kick out all the players(including the leaders and founder)

You will need to edit your idea to cover up all these possiblities. Creating abuse prevention for all steps
 

DeletedUser22235

Guest
Yes, he can kick out players that is where i also thought about but still don't know how to go to there.
If anyone knows how to find a good solution to this i will happy to hear about it.
Maybe it just to hard to accomplished and is this idea to hard to get it worked out.
I'm happy to get response to this. And am great full for ever reaction. :)
 

DeletedUser31161

Guest
Improvement Dissolve alliance

It a small ide for one but rather big idea for a alliance.
When there are 2 ore more with Founder Rights.
Each founder needs to approved to the Dissolve of alliance .

NO!!!!!
 

DeletedUser22235

Guest
We all know where this will end, it to hard to accomplished a will indeed stop sabotage.
This threat can have a lock on it, i did had to think it more through before posing it.
Thanks to all who Reply'd to this idea.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
A no from me.

You should only appoint trusted players into the top positions. If you appointed the wrong person..well that's your fault.
 

DeletedUser31161

Guest
this would make it very hard if i every wanted to get back into the espionage business. As many players say "Spying, though dirty is part of the game"
 

DeletedUser

Guest
It is all part of the game!
If you are clever and sneaky enough to persuade someone to make you a founder when you have the intention of dissolving the alliance, then you deserve to do it. More fool the guy who appointed you!
 

DeletedUser37056

Guest
No the game should not be made more safe. The risk in this game is good.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
maybe it could be that if someone leaves an alliance they can not join another one for 72hrs. if a founder dissolves an alliance the normal members can join a new one instantly but the founder can not for 72 hrs.

just a thought

Regards Char
 

DeletedUser24356

Guest
uhh you wrote format but were is it! Hello? this is the actual format
Proposal:


Reason:


Details:


Visual Aids:


Balance/Abuse Prevention:
 

DeletedUser

Guest
uhh you wrote format but were is it! Hello? this is the actual format
Proposal:


Reason:


Details:


Visual Aids:


Balance/Abuse Prevention:

Agreed, sort it out SJS xD


No from me, if you get Founder rights in an alliance, you can kick every single member out anyway, not much point in this if it wasn't already approved by other Founder(s)
 

DeletedUser18132

Guest
Proposal:
When there are 2 ore more with Founder Rights.
Each founder needs to approved to the Dissolve of alliance .

Reason:
This will improve a lot of thing.
Alliance will faster merge.
Develop trust in a alliance without the fear to get Disolved.

Details:

The reason i posted this idee,
I'v been there and had that.
No player likes to wake and see there top alliance getting dissolved.

There! :)
 

DeletedUser14492

Guest
If the idea is to make it harder for one crackpot idiot - who likes to negatively affect the enjoyment of a game for hundreds of people around the world in an alliance... then I am in favour of it. Anyone who does that is seriously lacking in moral fibre, we all play for fun, friend or foe, no need to be a .

But as has been stated, one idiot leader/founder can still kick everyone out. So I think a change is needed to the kick system. Perhaps any leader/founder can only kick a certain number of people, or a percentage of an alliance, in a given timeframe. With some form of dissolve alliance feature per the original post, there would rarely be a need to kick large numbers at any given time. Limiting the number in say, a 24 hour period, would stop one of these fools doing any real damage - other leaders would see what had happened and put a stop to it.

Ev
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Top