DeletedUser
Guest
(Now twice a week- Wednesday and Sunday)
So, I'm going to introduce something new to the forum in an attempt to make it more active now and in the future. The idea derived from the DnD forum and should get people to express more views. All the topics will be about Grepolis and more importantly, Phi world.
Every week, a question will be asked, which you can answer with your opinion below. There will be a couple rules in place to make sure this doesn't get out of hand as well as the normal forum rules.
If you plan to use this on another world... credit!
Every week, a question will be asked, which you can answer with your opinion below. There will be a couple rules in place to make sure this doesn't get out of hand as well as the normal forum rules.
If you plan to use this on another world... credit!
Respect is key. Respect everyones opinion, even if you don't agree with it yourself.
Keep on the discussion topic, don't stray.
No egotistical nonsense of any kind, everyone is equal, no matter of in game rank or so.
It is time for another DOTW! Remember that it is in relation to Phi, so name Phi alliances or use examples if need be! As well as that, send in your questions; some may be used in future DOTWs! Oh, and also feel free to pass this onto people in game from all sorts of alliances. The more views and more discussion, the better for Phi. Anyway, today's question is:
#4: Are some alliances too busy concentrating on diplomacy and recruitment on Phi?
Are alliances to busy on using alternative tactics instead of war on Phi? Is it right that alliances have academies, surplus pacts and are too busy filling to the member cap on Phi?
The low membership cap makes for interesting gameplay and although it tries to discourage mass recruiting, why do alliances (for example. Roman Empire) still do it? Is there a need for this amount of members or diplomacy and why do they do it? Can these alliances ever be successful? Discuss below...
Last edited by a moderator: