DeletedUser
Guest
u r a bad old man
But my question is this. How well do you think Sanity could manage in the core? When you put say, Bish against Sanity, or any other top 4 alliance, how do you think Sanity would manage? Sanity are having it far easier than many other top ranked alliances as they are just floating around in the rim, perhaps you should come join in on all the fun in the core and then we can all see if you're good enough to play ball with the big boys.
But my question is this. How well do you think Sanity could manage in the core? When you put say, Bish against Sanity, or any other top 4 alliance, how do you think Sanity would manage? Sanity are having it far easier than many other top ranked alliances as they are just floating around in the rim, perhaps you should come join in on all the fun in the core and then we can all see if you're good enough to play ball with the big boys.
All of you have done is told me that you've led "top ranked" alliances in past worlds. That is irrelevant. We're talking about Phi and we're talking about Sanity.
I did state that you guys were more aggressive and organized. And for that, I'm sure you do outnumber your enemies like any good alliance would.
And you have to stop using the "we're weeks behind" excuse. So be it, however, more than half of your players have more points than me, and I've been here since day 1. What's that got to say? Am I a noob? Lol, perhaps, or am I setting up alliance members rather than looking after myself? Perhaps. So your excuse is now invalid.
All of you have done is told me that you've led "top ranked" alliances in past worlds. That is irrelevant. We're talking about Phi and we're talking about Sanity.
I did state that you guys were more aggressive and organized. And for that, I'm sure you do outnumber your enemies like any good alliance would.
And you have to stop using the "we're weeks behind" excuse. So be it, however, more than half of your players have more points than me, and I've been here since day 1. What's that got to say? Am I a noob? Lol, perhaps, or am I setting up alliance members rather than looking after myself? Perhaps. So your excuse is now invalid.
not irrelivant?, me leading top allainces is me saying that I am a good experienced leader. All our wars/skirmishes (whatever you would call it) were against enemies larger than us. we were always outnumbered.
Actually, I was top 15 at once stage and that was for ABP and that was before I even broke 2500 points.but why don't you have a lot of points? Its ok to organize members but you only have 2300 attack battle points. You havent attacked much or been heavily involved with alliance conquest.
I've already said this before. I'm not as good as them as I am not as experienced. Sure I've been playing for a while, but playing and leading is quite different. I already said not to compare me to them because I'm no where near as good as them.You seem like a leader that teaches members how to play and sits back as they fight in the world. I never been in your alliance so don't know your ways but I would say your not as good as Daizan or OKC that lead on the frontline.
Of course it isn't impossible. If I, personally haven't got things such as real life which includes school and perhaps the most important years of my life, I might just be able to balance leading and playing a lot more. There are various factors we have to take in consideration, and clearly you have not.Its not impossible to do both, lead your alliance and at the same time grow. Lets not forget that you managed to recruit good players like Osl that put a lot of time and effort in Tiny Teddies, so dont pretend like all the success your alliance has had was because of you.
I'm not denying that you're weeks behind, but you're totally missing the point. Why do you think Sanity will have control of two oceans before any other decent alliance? Apart from factors such as organization, members, leadership, etc, what's the other stand out there? Want me to tell you or do you know what it is?We are weeks behind and thats a fact, no matter how you look at it. but we will have two oceans before any other allaince and I promise that Sanity will be the first in this world to accomplish that.
No flaming, just discussing SanityNot trying to flame, just expressing my opinion, only fair since you spoke your mind freely against me.
Fair enough but you have to consider factors that come into play. Who have you been colonizing? You see, I've said it time and time again. Sanity have it far easier than other alliances in the core. Sanity is already settled and organised well and it is near impossible for other alliances in that region in the core to establish themselves without being overpowered and outnumbered by Sanity. It's fact.so lets ignore size, points and look at what really matters. lets check the colonizations for the past week and see which alliances are working hard
still think sanity is behind other alliances?
Alright, first of all, you've lead these alliances in other worlds. It is irrelevant to a certain point where we are discussing Phi. And mind you, this is the first alliance I have ever lead. EVER. It was a premade. And what does that have to say?
Actually, I was top 15 at once stage and that was for ABP and that was before I even broke 2500 points.
I've already said this before. I'm not as good as them as I am not as experienced. Sure I've been playing for a while, but playing and leading is quite different. I already said not to compare me to them because I'm no where near as good as them.
Of course it isn't impossible. If I, personally haven't got things such as real life which includes school and perhaps the most important years of my life, I might just be able to balance leading and playing a lot more. There are various factors we have to take in consideration, and clearly you have not.
I'm not denying that you're weeks behind, but you're totally missing the point. Why do you think Sanity will have control of two oceans before any other decent alliance? Apart from factors such as organization, members, leadership, etc, what's the other stand out there? Want me to tell you or do you know what it is?
Fair enough but you have to consider factors that come into play. Who have you been colonizing? You see, I've said it time and time again. Sanity have it far easier than other alliances in the core. Sanity is already settled and organised well and it is near impossible for other alliances in that region in the core to establish themselves without being overpowered and outnumbered by Sanity. It's fact.
Behind other alliances? Care to define that? All I know for sure is that Sanity is further away from the core. And there core is where the top alliances currently reside.
the thing about TT was that we were all great players, a leader could delagate any/all of his jobs to another player and they would be done to the same level of quality or higher. (if the player couldn't manage this they would talk get help and have learned how in a matter of minutes.) this is why cheeze was able to leave for a while. he only left because he couldn't give 100% effort. so I say that a small player giving 100% is better than a largish player who can not give his all.
(before you go looking me up on grepostats, I left and gave the alliance my cities)
Don't use the real life excuse, seriously? I got school for 8 hours and then work for 7, then driving back and forth and sleep, how much time does that give me to play? not much, but I can organize my alliance and still grow bigger than you.
Smiley, there's plenty of stuff to talk about. I suggest you start by posting about ocean 55 in the "The State of Your Ocean" thread. Actually, I have a feeling that the reason you got reputation retracted was that you haven't done this, and I suspect this might be the only way to win back the reputation lost(!).