DeletedUser22133
Guest
And Shimmert... the thread against 2.0 has been deleted... And you'll think that the vote is a democratic one????
Karel, please make sure you read this before you continue to post on this issue.
If you choose to preach democracy, don't support those that are undermining it, and realize there are a lot more players than just the top 100/200/etc. Yes, they are the bigger, more experienced players and should have a bigger say, but then it wouldn't be a democracy now, would it, as then the small players wouldn't have an equal say. And there are quite a few of them, odds are they outnumber those in the top more than you may expect, and the majority of them would likely vote for 2.0.
Karel, please make sure you read this before you continue to post on this issue.
If you choose to preach democracy, don't support those that are undermining it, and realize there are a lot more players than just the top 100/200/etc. Yes, they are the bigger, more experienced players and should have a bigger say, but then it wouldn't be a democracy now, would it, as then the small players wouldn't have an equal say. And there are quite a few of them, odds are they outnumber those in the top more than you may expect, and the majority of them would likely vote for 2.0.
Z...
Does Rhode Island have the same number of representatives as New York? No, yet it is still democracy. Nothing wrong with representative democracy. A 175 point player in World Beta (yes, some new players are still joining) should not have the same vote as redneck woman who has 164 cities and has been playing since the game started. Sorry....that just isn't fair. And it is very disingenous for innogames to pretend otherwise.
~GS
It's becoming fancy eh.