DeletedUser31385
Guest
No, what I am saying is an alliance could win and then die out and another rise up and get the award for 7.
No, what I am saying is an alliance could win and then die out and another rise up and get the award for 7.
I have posted a suggestion for an ammendment to the end-game in the Acropolis.
https://forum.en.grepolis.com/showthread.php?55934-Possible-change-to-End-game
This would remove the abuse mentioned above and provide a clear winner, whilst encouaging everyone to carry on fighting. No Simmer or Turtle alliances could meet the winning conditions fully, only actively fighting alliances.
It seems it is OK to criticise INNO and call for a new end-game without accepting how difficult it is to put into practise. I believe that we all want an end-game which does as it says and provides a conclusion to the game with a clear winner.
The present end-game does not do this, with a world dragging on and on and players dropping out through boredom or wanting a new challenge and dissatisfaction at other alliances being able to wait it out in order to get easy Victor awards.