.All of the name calling is justified Jamo. Being called ignorant isn’t perhaps a bad thing, All it does it note that you are ignorant in a specific area of knowledge, I’m ignorant in all matters related to American sports and Japanese manga comics, I just don't care for either and as a result won't talk about them. Fallacious simply notes that have made numerous fallacious arguments, Pathetic simply notes you have made numerous pathetic claims and hypocritical simply notes I have called you on numerous hypocritical claims. The name calling in this situation is justified however if you actually read what I said..
Well I could call you Ignorant, Pathetic, Hypocritical or Fallacious, But I think troll suits you better.
I could very well call you those things, but I instead opted for Troll as I think you well know exactly what you are doing.
If you fail to see the circular argument theory i am afraid it is either ignorance or you being deliberately obtuse.
Grep : Neg rep
GGN : Iam being honest
Grep: how do we know?
GGN: because I say so.
Grep : neg rep.
So much for consistency Jamo it has gone from I was duel accounting to Neg Rep. LOL... Keep on scraping the bottom of the Barrel Jams.. And you accused me of changing my stories?.. Hypocrite much?
When did I say "because I said so" as a response to a reason why I should be trusted? I don't recall saying that. It would be a shame if you where deliberately misrepresenting me to make that claim... Again Fallacious Jamo rearing his ugly head... Secondly, "Neg Rep"/"Iam being honest" is a non-sequitur, the premise does not follow from each other. As with the example of the African Prince, It follows that could say, "You can trust me because I said so". The premises follow each other. But it does not follow that "Neg rep"/"Iam being honest". The two premises do not follow from each other, its like saying "There is water on Mars, Therefore the Moon is made of Cheese". Ultimately the two premises need to be logically linked to justify them as do not directly follow from each other like the African prince example. It is pathetic that you would be so inconsistent with your reasoning as it makes you appear so ignorant in general reasoning.
Once again. I
could call you Ignorant, Pathetic, Fallacious and Hypocritical. But again I think you know what you are doing..
As for ****, well he is a Mod and follows the rules. You know very very well last time i printed proof of your double accounting I got a ban on the forum and it got deleted,..oh and conclusive it was..shame ****admitted it couldn't be acted on as Dan Haag wa ghosted it didn't qualify as DA 6 months after the fact
Lazy mods? Sounds personal, I will steer clear of your personal beef with ****. But it is not my fault you contradicted forum rules is it? You are the one who rants on about the rules, then violated them. Not me.
Also I too had numerous posts deleted that day also, an entire thread was gutted.
Now also, You were sitting on that message for months before it was mentioned here, Why did it take over six months for you to act on it? If you had the ammo why didn't you use it? Even if it was evidence, which as I have already explained it was justified from my perspective. Why sit on it for so long? Perhaps you once again have only yourself to blame for the fact I’am not banned?
I cannot comment on what the mods have told you, in fact I would wager that is information that you should not even be talking about here. But that aside, why should I believe you on this that **** even said that? You have as I have shown above that you are willing to lie to prove a point or prove your narrative. I have seen comments from yourself and froggy in which you make numerous references to this fact but so far have no idea if that is something that has even come from the mods or is something you cooked up to sound impressive?. Even if it were true, as you well know the mods are not allowed (or supposed) to talk about individual cases aside from with the person they are concerning. As a result if this where true, I would have to wonder about insider information and if someone in the mod team was violating those rules. You are going down a dangerous road here Jamo...
I don't doubt that Grepo cannot act on cases that took place so long ago, But I wonder therefore considering the above wonder if **** actually did acknowledge that I’m involved in that, Or more likely, You are conflating his words to make it appear as if he did.
you sir are a liar and a cheat..enjoy your crown , I challenge you to win another anywhere that is not a 400 cap server with lazy mods.
Lol.... How would I know if the mods are lazy or not? I don't know them personally, Thought that was yours and froggy's area of expertize?
Plus what has server cap got to do with it?