probably because you're not going to set up a nuclear reactor to just power a local stadium
probably because you're not going to set up a nuclear reactor to just power a local stadium
reminds of this nuclear plant that almost got up and running about an hour away from where i live, but then people realized that there are risks in this sort of thing.But...atomic power isn't that likely to be dangerous. Only 3 major incidents since 1979. Not too terrible, especially considering how they malfunctioned. Also, two of those three, there were no casualties directly related to the fallout.
/me sits down
It's not really something you build to only power a stadium though. It's a massive undertaking, very expensive and generates enough to power cities. It would be unnecessarily grandiose.
We weren't given the size of the stadium. As it is a hypothetical, I hypothesize it is to power a new stadium the size of Tokyo.
Why would a people need a stadium the size of Tokyo?
Well im not a big sports guy so i really don't desire this stadium but either way you still didn't answer my question.Necessity? Pshhh. Its called desire, mate. If no one here secretly wants a stadium the size of Tokyo, then they are surely in denial.
Well im not a big sports guy so i really don't desire this stadium but either way you still didn't answer my question.
Why would a people need a stadium the size of Tokyo?
for public readings of a pebbles poetry .. Can you imagine the sound system that would be required for a stadium that size?
By not answering the question?I answered it like any good politician advocating for a nuclear-powered, Tokyo-sized stadium would.
for public readings of a pebbles poetry .. Can you imagine the sound system that would be required for a stadium that size?
Undoubtedly. Wait, the sound system or your poetry?