DeletedUser8396
Guest
As many of you know, the corporation known as Hobby Lobby argued their case in the Supreme Court to be exempt from the "law that requires no-cost access to contraception as part of a healthcare plan." Hobby Lobby did this under the argument that it violated the corporation's religious sense of morality (in this case, Christian).
You can read in more detail here: Hobby Lobby Supreme Court Ruling ~ The Guardian
As for the debate:
1. Is the Supreme Court's ruling viable and abiding by the Constitution, specifically the 1st Amendment?
2. Was this decision poorly considered in terms of what leeway it has granted other corporations, religious sects, and more? (Despite the answer to the above question).
3. Does any corporation executive's religious belief give him justifiable reason to deny a service? Why or why not?
You can read in more detail here: Hobby Lobby Supreme Court Ruling ~ The Guardian
As for the debate:
1. Is the Supreme Court's ruling viable and abiding by the Constitution, specifically the 1st Amendment?
2. Was this decision poorly considered in terms of what leeway it has granted other corporations, religious sects, and more? (Despite the answer to the above question).
3. Does any corporation executive's religious belief give him justifiable reason to deny a service? Why or why not?