DeletedUser22708
Guest
And Digi..you know that is just an outright blatant lie LOL
ro:
Well i'm playing caly atm and the players with a crown there kind of suck lol
And Digi..you know that is just an outright blatant lie LOL
ro:
Wow, if we get 2nd in Pella that would exceed Triad's 2nd in Athens !!!
We're a distant third in Pella ... we started several months late there (just after we won Athens in fact !).
Having said that ronnie, I started 6 weeks after you there, but seem to have acquired 34% more cities than you already, so theres always hope !
Apparently, any number of alliances can win the Crowns in Athens !?
So if Triad win them, and see a drop off in players like MORC did, then any MORC die-hards can carry on fighting.
If they eventually break Triad's 7 Wonders and rebuild their own, then MORC will also get the Crowns !
So ... which is more valuable !? The Winners award that goes to one alliance, and only one alliance.
Or the 7 Wonders award, which can go to any number of alliances !
In World Epsilon ... SEVEN alliances won the crowns !
Thats the final nail in the coffin for the idea that the Crowns are a uniquely special award.
What's more impressive? Building 4 wonders quickly by simming and spamming resources OR breaking another alliances (that is larger than you)
Leon, if it's such a non-important award why do you guys want it so desperately? I think that achieveing this award against an alliance that was still fighting so desperately to keep its wonders to prevent us building all 7 does make it special. Whereas if you guy wait untill all of Triad leave to then build your 7 WW's that's a pretty easy achievement. A bit different dont you think?
I'm disputing your apparent belief leo that the Title Master of Athens is a nothing award. It is still an impressive achievement.~ SH101
I never said its not important, 2nd place in Athens IS important ! (just not as important as 1st place !) ~Leonidas Agiad
Well i'm playing caly atm and the players with a crown there kind of suck lol
Does the fact that Innogames thought that getting all 7 wonders would be too hard to make it an effective 'victory condition' not give the achievement of 7 wonders an equal footing with building 4 when the world was more active?
Does the fact that Innogames thought that getting all 7 wonders would be too hard to make it an effective 'victory condition' not give the achievement of 7 wonders an equal footing with building 4 when the world was more active?