DeletedUser41523
Guest
that's to boring
Which is why Gamma had over 10000 players for a year and a half and now a world can't keep that for three months right?
that's to boring
My answer will be as it's always been. No lets just get rid of WW or at least down play their purpose. There should be no end game to a world and we should just put up our dukes and do this old school till we all die of boredom.
yea I would lose all interest in playing grepolis, there needs to be a goal for me other than satisfaction of winning a war.
exactly, that's why I propose to destroy everything, the best alliance would win
people build 25 walls and thermal baths now? there will always be turtle I don't see how your reasoning appliesAfter seeing your answers to my questions, no. People would just build a 25 wall with thermal baths then demolish everything for defensive troops. This would make an intense Mexican Standoff that lasts until people get bored
I think never ending war is still better. But again this idea doesn't even make a ton of sense if you look at it. Again you could only destroy so many towns before you couldn't touch your enemies anymore. Where as in conquest you could keep fighting and eventually chase then across the server if need be.
Why should you lose a city for taking out another city? I think it will be better if you could have your city.
???? No you get to keep your cities but if your city gets destroyed then you lose it.
And howa about this guys, during the the time of the WW you have an option to destroy a city, you can still conquer a city but the only way to get city slots is if you destroy a city. Also at that time any city under 2000 points will automatically be destroyed and no can join after this. You can also not colonize
Proposal: Clearly as we all know, the majority of us hate WW. And yes several alternatives have been suggested but they often seem confusing and complicated. Well this idea is simple, easy to get used to, and just better IMO. basically it would be the era of destruction.
Have you Checked the DNS and PSI lists in the Archives? Is this idea similar to one that has been previously suggested?
a little bit, and there are similar things but I believe mine stands out
Reason: the current system is just dumb and disappointing and we need some good change here.
Details: basically you would meet the same requirements that you do to get to the WW to get the destruction era. and nothing would change except instead of building WW you destroy your enemies cities. The way you destroy an enemy city is generally the same way you conquer a city, except instead of a colony ship, you have a different ship ( resource cost and pop. is not for my deciding) maybe call it the destructioniator and basically instead of sending a colony ship you would send the destructioniator and if it landed instead of gaining control of the city you would destroy it. you could still conquer, but the only way to gain city slots would be to destroy a city. you could also not colonize.
Visual Aids:none
Balance: I don't think it needs balancing
Abuse Prevention: none to my current knowledge
Summary: basically to fix the broken end game system to promote more fighting and actually let people who deserve it to win the world not simmers.
as always constructive criticism is welcomed
Sorry but this idea doesnt make sense at all. A no from me, sorry man- if you thought it out more it could probably be a good idea.