What steps are taken to ensure we account for this to be an equitable vote? Eg. One 45 person premade can easily skew the vote in their favour. Only asking because # of committed players in each world is dwindling, and so these polls basically enable bigger premades to have an easy vote advantage (and win) - and disadvantages individuals like myself, who's vote may not count for a lot.
Overall, I think it would make the world more exciting for bigger groups (supposedly thinking of joining as a premade) to be forced to split off into multiple competing alliances. Makes for a more interesting world.
I would second this. Large alliances are fine but unfortunately with less and less players, one powerhouse rises to the top very easily. E.G. Fiasco United in world Kepoi. Of course any team in the past could rise to the top in the same way, but with less competition, for anyone wanting to rival that top end group, its significantly harder.
Not to get all financial, but I'm pretty sure that if we start moving to smaller alliances, the game will remain competitive for longer, longer its competitive, the more gold is bought
. But thats my two cents. Ive been in both big and small and simply just prefer the small out of companionship. Though, I do recognize what I would consider the need to downsize a bit.
As we can see by the votes, there is a want for a 25 person limit. So I would at least like to see a world soon with that set up, even if its not this one.