Noobs: Experts at killing their own troops

Status
Not open for further replies.

ppsarkar08

Phrourach
Wall wasn't lvl 6 when I began stacking it.Was brought down from 25 to 6 somewhere in those mid range attacks.
No we weren't but most are in DD by now,except a couple who left for unknown reasons.
Reason was well-known to all, but did not trust their leaders and left their co-founder alone. Even, they did not contact after that.
 

Grandaizer

Phrourach
Hey! Good job you managed to take cities off an alliance with 9 players! So proud of you :)
Those 9 guys have 325 cities all together. So mainly when they tutrle and no one fights them, they could do 100x times better than loosing 6 cities in 48hrs.

Also you say that they are just 9 players and that's not the thing for which Noobs might be proud. Well I'll pay attention again to the numbers and take an example from what happened.

Noobrs overall have 52 players and turtle 9, to make ratio - 52/9=5,7

MGGA overall 135 players and TF 29, to make ratio - 4,7

So why are you proud of taking city from us if it's shame to take city from an alliance with that ratio?
 

DeusVult

Chiliarch
Those 9 guys have 325 cities all together. So mainly when they tutrle and no one fights them, they could do 100x times better than loosing 6 cities in 48hrs.

Also you say that they are just 9 players and that's not the thing for which Noobs might be proud. Well I'll pay attention again to the numbers and take an example from what happened.

Noobrs overall have 52 players and turtle 9, to make ratio - 52/9=5,7

MGGA overall 135 players and TF 29, to make ratio - 4,7

So why are you proud of taking city from us if it's shame to take city from an alliance with that ratio?
Difference here is(I don't believe) we ever mention or boast about our takes from you on here. Unless it's brought up by you or noobs first, and only then to make a point.

I already know his name is on the tip of your tongue, so i will clear it up for you. It is well known shaz speaks for himself, not the whole of the alliance.
 

Grandaizer

Phrourach
Difference here is(I don't believe) we ever mention or boast about our takes from you on here. Unless it's brought up by you or noobs first, and only then to make a point.

I already know his name is on the tip of your tongue, so i will clear it up for you. It is well known shaz speaks for himself, not the whole of the alliance.
The best post from you during whole encounter on the forums.

I gave just facts btw and yep now even you realize what kind of stuff is written by Shaz, but imo when someone represents an alliance on forums and speaks with the name of their alliance, the responsibility is still shared by other members. Again that's just my opinion.
 
Difference here is(I don't believe) we ever mention or boast about our takes from you on here. Unless it's brought up by you or noobs first, and only then to make a point.

I already know his name is on the tip of your tongue, so i will clear it up for you. It is well known shaz speaks for himself, not the whole of the alliance.
Hmm. I dont seem to understand? You say "WE" so that means, shaz isn't part of "WE"(MGGA)?

And you can say shaz speaks for himself, but he did start bragging about taking cities from us, and we just retaliated.
 

DeusVult

Chiliarch
The best post from you during whole encounter on the forums.

I gave just facts btw and yep now even you realize what kind of stuff is written by Shaz, but imo when someone represents an alliance on forums and speaks with the name of their alliance, the responsibility is still shared by other members. Again that's just my opinion.
And my opinion is that you are wrong.

Hmm. I dont seem to understand? You say "WE" so that means, shaz isn't part of "WE"(MGGA)?

And you can say shaz speaks for himself, but he did start bragging about taking cities from us, and we just retaliated.
Don't really care how you choose to pick apart my words. The game speaks for itself. I also don't really care if you are much smaller than us. It's how grepo works. Ive been in alliances where we lose against a much larger enemy i dont go crying saying its their fault because they are larger.

You guys are really just burning yourselves out.
 

Grandaizer

Phrourach
No one is crying about that and yeah I agree you that's how Grepo works, mainly I don't have right to cry, because when I was in Synergy we were hammering TF/TLB besides them being smaller (but surely with smaller ratios lol) and I approved that even on forums.

The thing about which entire world complains is that you simply kill all the fun. Why? Because you guys equal with size around 3-4 Top 12 alliances and because of that it becomes very hard to fight against you, mainly when we all work separately.

136 players, even if each player sends 1 support that's already over stacked city.

Think of it guys and what kind of honor and fun do you find in this kind of game, I don't really get.
 
I am not crying about how big you are i could care less, but you shouldnt brag about taking our cities, neither you, or shaz should do it. We can also start bragging about taking cities of off you, but we dont do that, do we? NO. We do not.
 

Thizzle

Strategos
Just to add to the crap on here. Reason for why we hit Turtles was because they supported MGGA cities. And to shot down the theory of us going against much smaller alliances. Several of the cities we took had loads of incomming MGGA support.

So to us MGGA and turtles = same
 

DeusVult

Chiliarch
Just to add to the crap on here. Reason for why we hit Turtles was because they supported MGGA cities. And to shot down the theory of us going against much smaller alliances. Several of the cities we took had loads of incomming MGGA support.

So to us MGGA and turtles = same
And yet you fail to mention you also lost cities to turtles :)
 

DeusVult

Chiliarch
What is there to mention? i never said we havent lost cities. I was just shooting down your claims of us attacking "smaller" alliances
My question is.. how could noobs possibly lose cities to a 9 player alliance then? And it was only 1 player who actually took them
 

DeusVult

Chiliarch
Because that 1 player who got attacked never asked for help. And again i have to correct you. Its not a 9 player alliance, its around 140 players alliance ;)
Except it was only turtles players attacking you. So you were up against 9 players.

And by the more than 1 of your players lost cities :)

If i really wanted to go digging around on here i can find where you and others have said
"Saying you lost the city because the player didnt ask for help or post is just an excuse"

So i guess i will throw it back at you. Stop making excuses thizz ;)
 

Thizzle

Strategos
Except it was only turtles players attacking you. So you were up against 9 players.

And by the more than 1 of your players lost cities :)

If i really wanted to go digging around on here i can find where you and others have said
"Saying you lost the city because the player didnt ask for help or post is just an excuse"

So i guess i will throw it back at you. Stop making excuses thizz ;)
Where am i making excuses? you asked me how come he lost his city and i gave you the answer ;)
 

Kal Gordon

Phrourach
I'm sorry, but please can we all not turn this into a competition. There are things that are fine to start having competitions about on these externals, and I sincerely believe that this is not one of them.

Can we get this back on topic? I don't care if that is interpreted as "let's all talk trash about Kal again". What I care about is that we are arguing over which alliance has shown more respect for a fallen player. People have shown respect for Andy in various ways. Please, let's leave it at that, and not have an argument about a tragic real life event such as this.
 

Kal Gordon

Phrourach
so what exactly is this thread about? i'm not up on all the doings in pagasae
This thread was created by an MGGA leader to complain about our biggest player gaining a load of BP by killing his own units.

For reference:
- Said player would still be 2nd for BP on the server even without that extra BP.
- Our leadership had actually just ordered a complete respecialisation, from a defence-biased setup (due to fighting multiple alliances for a while) to an offence-biased setup (now that 4 of the 5 alliances that were hitting us are basically no more), so the player did have to get rid of a tonne of defence, and attacking it is actually the best way of doing it for maximum BP gain.
- BP trading is something that MGGA are highly suspected of practicing a lot, given the possible sources for their BP versus the actual fighting that has been going on.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.