DeletedUser22940
Guest
Thanks for updating the stats. Even though 2 of those conquers are against an inactive player, we should have done a better job grabbing them before you did.
Well done.
Well done.
so that means they are losing more cities the to just ONE*. not looking good:s titan they are changing but you have circled some players that left before the war even started :S
So far as i can see it
wave 1: INP:7 ONE*:1
wave 2: INP:9 ONE*:3
So you have taken two more than last time as have they. I see little change and it appears you guys are still loosing, Plus you took 3 cities in the same 12 hours when they lost 7 to other alliances which will have dived there support.
And the players didnt leave, they was kicked cos of being inactive or serving bans
yes but this and the other one you booted that lost a city or 2.... you stick together as a team or play as individuals, the 2 can't mix - make your choice please
As I said SweetT, there were valid reasons for kicking arie. Similar to the reasons you gave for kicking N2S (without the nasty dead animal PnP). As for us kicking our inactives, that is standard policy. Many people do that. Look @ ngaicodo as an example. We took 4 or 5 cities from him, but the Hawks didn't want the red dots so they kicked him. Just one recent example of many.
you can add 2 more in 6 minsScore:
INP - 9
ONE* - 14 (not including 3 towns we took from players who were kicked out right after we started taking their cities).
We will soon post a update on how this war is going, i must say im a bit dissapointed.