xFate
Strategos
Who would have thought that both the community managers and Innogames themselves are so out of touch with its community
Pre-World Therma Discussion Thread
- Thread starter Baudin Toolan
- Start date
- Status
Who would have thought that both the community managers and Innogames themselves are so out of touch with its community
DeletedUser57254
Guest
Why is revolt so complex to set up in Olympus world???
DeletedUser41523
Guest
Bandwagoning off of this, this world doesn't add enough different to be valuable. There hasn't even really been a relevant team that's lost on Sidon to make this a good consolation world. There's no premades specifically asking for these settings. All you're really doing is just screwing over Sidon and revolt players. If you're shooting for the En121 and En124 crowd then you probably should have just waited a few weeks on releasing Sidon.
DeletedUser57129
Guest
For goodness sake, another conquest? Seriously a revolt world is closing in 6 days and you think a conquest world is what we want? Wow, you must be getting rich some other way because there is an entire server full of players who will have nowhere interesting to go into other then half finished worlds we aren't gonna throw a ton of money at.... bravo, smart move.
destroxxi
Phrourach
Pretty much same opinion tink. I wouldnt mind a conquest world but I don't have a group to go with there n every time i go alone its just a waste of time...
DeletedUser41523
Guest
As some advice, Therma shouldn't be the hardest conquest world open right now. Maybe OV or LOE show up but both have been pretty willing take in people in the past. So if you want to give it a try, it shouldn't be hard to find a group.
Gompus Rompus
Phrourach
should be NO morale on this one
DeletedUser55681
Guest
What about a 3 city start, 60 member alliance, and NO morale
DeletedUser33951
Guest
3 city starts are not a vibe, agree with the rest though
DeletedUser55742
Guest
Why dont you guys in this case release two worlds, a revolt world with dom or WW and this new endgame with CQ, that should balance the scales to some level. its not long ago that you used to release 2 worlds at the same time, why not now when you have little choice with the new end game
DeletedUser47671
Guest
Slower than Sidon, no thanks.
Was hoping new world to be slower than Oreus but faster than Sidon and not Olympus. Guess I wait some more...
Was hoping new world to be slower than Oreus but faster than Sidon and not Olympus. Guess I wait some more...
FazeWalker
Phrourach
What a let down, the settings
kingpg28
Phrourach
@Hydna @Baudin Toolan the grepo community has decided we are done with cq so only release revolt after this world.. need a speed 6
DeletedUser53831
Guest
Terrible settings
VIRTUALSELF
Strategos
You are spreading your playerbase waaay to thin by adding yet another endgame. Grepolis has AT MAX 5000 returning active players, and now we have 5 combinations of endgame and RR/CQ (6 when RR gets Olympus) with every player having their own preferences. Not even putting speed and morale into the equation.
Overextending killed a lot of things
Overextending killed a lot of things
DeletedUser57138
Guest
Although i know the answer since its X2, where does it state the amount of starting cities.
I am pretty sure, there is a feature where we start with 3cities instead of 1.
Since its X2, its 99% gonna be 1city at the beginning, but regardless, you should probably confirm the amount of starting cities.
I am pretty sure, there is a feature where we start with 3cities instead of 1.
Since its X2, its 99% gonna be 1city at the beginning, but regardless, you should probably confirm the amount of starting cities.
DeletedUser57251
Guest
Was waiting for a new world after coming back to grepo after quite a long time(as i started late the one I'm playing ). But the settings tells me I have to wait for a few more months!!!
At least make it revolt :/ 2 back to back CQ world isn't good
At least make it revolt :/ 2 back to back CQ world isn't good
All worlds start with 1 city unless specified otherwise and this is a normal 1 city world.
DeletedUser51263
Guest
with Beta the first OE just finishing up, the bug issues will not be as bad as many predict. There weren't all that many there and they were dealt with fairly quickly. Bugs aren't the issue.
Putting a German server and an EN server game up was a good move to get the general Grep players involved. En OE has most established players/teams involved. good speed and morale and no NB this server is doing well. that is not the rub either.
The problem is that another OE server is going to pull good players away from learning the strategies to play the entire set of phases. Many who may think they are already out of the game will be tempted to move to get a better start. This will impact the existing EN server negatively IMO
The OE game is truly an ENDGAME variation. There is a lot of alliance interaction that can only ramp up as the game progresses, even in the last phase. I would encourage good players in this first EN server OE to stick it out. Then you will be better able to lead teams through follow-up OE worlds.
I can imagine Inno may have not gotten a good jump in this first En server simply because Himera and possibly other worlds are going long. so they are hoping to get to the 10,000 players between the two. $$$$$. But really they may end up pissing off a lot of players in existing OE servers by ruining the games they have already started.
As a side note: INNO please go back to larger player caps. almost every server now has been won by coalitions simply because at the end more players are needed to compete against stacked alliance(s). in the end this causes many new players to not move to the next world because they werent in a group that shared the rewards beyond the lower cap number Or, worse they are leaving because the winning players are fro set pre-mades not always merit. Larger caps with pact limits (try that one on) should meld players together faster and share the rewards among larger numbers increasing likelihood of continued play in future worlds.
Putting a German server and an EN server game up was a good move to get the general Grep players involved. En OE has most established players/teams involved. good speed and morale and no NB this server is doing well. that is not the rub either.
The problem is that another OE server is going to pull good players away from learning the strategies to play the entire set of phases. Many who may think they are already out of the game will be tempted to move to get a better start. This will impact the existing EN server negatively IMO
The OE game is truly an ENDGAME variation. There is a lot of alliance interaction that can only ramp up as the game progresses, even in the last phase. I would encourage good players in this first EN server OE to stick it out. Then you will be better able to lead teams through follow-up OE worlds.
I can imagine Inno may have not gotten a good jump in this first En server simply because Himera and possibly other worlds are going long. so they are hoping to get to the 10,000 players between the two. $$$$$. But really they may end up pissing off a lot of players in existing OE servers by ruining the games they have already started.
As a side note: INNO please go back to larger player caps. almost every server now has been won by coalitions simply because at the end more players are needed to compete against stacked alliance(s). in the end this causes many new players to not move to the next world because they werent in a group that shared the rewards beyond the lower cap number Or, worse they are leaving because the winning players are fro set pre-mades not always merit. Larger caps with pact limits (try that one on) should meld players together faster and share the rewards among larger numbers increasing likelihood of continued play in future worlds.
Last edited by a moderator:
- Status