Blah why waste time taking cities from actives when your not in a war and there is free 13k cities lying around.
Well, considering you guys fought some wars in the past, as a 'leader', why not lead by example and take it to the enemy (you'll notice my own history is littered with Nightmare of Elysium cities, Pandemic ones, followed by Blackwatch and Corcyran League cities....) Also, i wouldnt consider taking down active players a waste of time, its far more rewarding BP-wise, and furthermore, its where i derive enjoyment from the game (pitting strategy, tactics, timing, and luck---there's no greater thrill than finding worthy opponents) BP is heavy on D because of the obvious.
The 300 were around longer as a top alliance then renegades.
A point you seem to enjoy mentioning at every turn...i dont really need to promote the Renegades, we don't need to toot our own horn....and, i notice your alliance has reformed, but you're not a member...speaks volumes to me.... But then, reading all the posts by former 300 members who were disgusted by the way things ended there, and the OFa merge, i'm not surprised you arent back in the fold.....
I went on vacation for 3 weeks. And I play less then 30 minutes a day. top 13 in BP top 100 offensive top 3 in defenders top 30 in points led the longest lasting top alliance
You didnt lead from the outset...in fact, i had a great amount of respect for the old 300 players, like steelback and chimeroon. The only thing i know TenD is that you are a hothead, and even your own alliance will admit the same thing. I won't comment on your leadership skills, as i wasnt a member of your alliance, but, the fact that many of the old guard messaged me expressing discontent towards you is certainly suggestive of what kind of leader i would have found you to have been had i been in the same alliance as you . I deserve a 12/10.
Then why even have this thread if you're just going to push for your own rating of yourself? I'm expressing an opinion, and i dont rate you anywhere near a 10....if you had more top notch conquers, if you had more offensive BPs, if you hadn't lost cities to others, if you had shown yourself to be a more tactful diplomat....then i would have given you a higher grade...fact is, i gave you wht i felt you deserved...IN MY OWN HONEST OPINIONYou know it.
(Getting top 3 in defenders is no bragging point when you consider those were earned by having your cities decimated by OFA...) Plus if I gave a 6 to the player below me who had only 100k in points and 40k bp how am I only .5 above him. Your rating system is flawed.
Who said anything about having the SAME rating system...by your own admission in your own post you have high standards, and therefore, surely you can concede the possibility that others may have higher standards than you (such as myself)
Not to mention you created an account just to put that as your first post clearly showing somebody asked you to make that post. So I win
You win? when was this a competition? I created this account because, having been a casual reader for ages, i thought i'd like to get a chance to swap ideas with some other people in the game who i respect and know by reputation alone... As I have debunked your rating and cause of it.
Thats even if you are howardyang and not an imposter. Most likely an imposter because howardyang takes 2 days to anwser an in game message so I doubt he reads these forums.
Hahaha, well, actually, it really is me. And i admit i am slow to answer ingame mesages...they arent, and have never been a huge priority for me, and my reply speed is determined by how much i respect you as a player....oh, and to prove i'm who i am, i'll post a picture of my wall in the other thread.
