DeletedUser
Guest
Question: What do you believe are the pros & cons of whether you choose to "round out" (both/other) or "specialize"(def./off.)?
Reason for question: In reading the Wiki/Player guides, I became sold on the idea that to specialize was the best/preferred way to go. The "selling point" that got me hooked was the pointing out that one will not have enough research points available to complete all the research available. (I don't believe building a Library resolves this.)
However, I have since found in-game that many experienced players seem to dismiss (or outright scoff at) the idea of specializing. :heh:
So, I'm finding myself wanting some feedback from experienced players on how best to go about the game. Do you specialize in one and then make your second city the other type? Or, do you choose not to specialize at all?
Thank you for your feedback.
Reason for question: In reading the Wiki/Player guides, I became sold on the idea that to specialize was the best/preferred way to go. The "selling point" that got me hooked was the pointing out that one will not have enough research points available to complete all the research available. (I don't believe building a Library resolves this.)
However, I have since found in-game that many experienced players seem to dismiss (or outright scoff at) the idea of specializing. :heh:
So, I'm finding myself wanting some feedback from experienced players on how best to go about the game. Do you specialize in one and then make your second city the other type? Or, do you choose not to specialize at all?
Thank you for your feedback.