Wish List Simple but effective END game

DeletedUser37948

Guest
Proposal: A new end game to rid the comunity of the bain of ww


Have you Checked the DNS and PSI lists in the Archives? Is this idea similar to one that has been previously suggested?
no could not be botherd my bad :(

Reason:we need a new end game


Details: If servers ran for a set time , for instance 1 year. At the end of the year the rank 1 alliance wins the server.


Visual Aids: non needed


Balance: To make this work there would need to be tweeks. the first is a cut off point for alliance changes ie: after 9 months it becomes impossible to change alliance.
in most sports they have a recruitment/ transfer window this would work in a similer way.


Abuse Prevention: after the 9 month window has passed it would need to be impossible to disband an alliance. If a founder quit on his team then there would need to be a way for leadership to be transferd


Summary: with a deadline and no choice but to play war at the nine month point the world would polerise into only alliances that actualy could contend the last 3 months would be brutal conflict and a true prize fight.
 

DeletedUser35069

Guest
Kinda like the simplicity but it would be so easy for alliances to just in fight and increase bp stats without much effort apart from building more troops and then getting them killed again. It would be so open to abuse, can't think of a way around that ether as if you blocked alliances attacking themselves they would struggle to break sieges.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Simple idea but it will encourage simming since it's point based.
 

DeletedUser35069

Guest
I guessed it was based on Bp stats not fat stats. Not sure many pay attention to fat stats really.
 

DeletedUser37948

Guest
cities have a max points but who cares about points the winner would need to be based on total number of cities owned yes people could sim and found but its easier to steal and the bp is better
a hidden benifit of this system is that you could have long or short server durations a person who cant commit to a hole year of full on game play may be able to commit to a shorter time.
also having a set time to play would add to the games stratergy
 

DeletedUser48073

Guest
But sometimes the number 1 alliance is not always the best alliance. Also, if their is a set time and an alliance is ranked 10 with a month left to go, what is the motivation for those players if they know that they will not win?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top