DeletedUser
Guest
Okay okay I know this has been discussed many times before but let's just discuss it again, seeing as I was never part of the other discussions okay we all know that hops take more time and resources to make than slings but let's look at the advantages/disadvantages of both hops and slings:
Slings:
Wood:55
Stone:100
Silver:40
Total resources required: 195
Speed: 28
Time to make (on a world speed two): 9 mins 32 seconds
Defense: 7 blunt, 8 sharp, 2 distance
Hoplites:
Wood:0
Stone: 150
Silver: 75
Total resources required: 225
Speed:12
Time to make (on world speed two): 10 mins 58 seconds
Defense: 18 blunt, 12 sharp, 7 distance
Okay so slings are cheaper by 30 resources, not that much, and they take 1 min 26 seconds less. They are the worse possible for defense. About two times faster than hops.
Hops have a higher defensive value, meaning they would contribute more in an assault than slings and You would lose less hops in an attack than slings, normally. Plus most people build more swords than archers.
Would anyone care to give there opinions between slings and hops?
Slings:
Wood:55
Stone:100
Silver:40
Total resources required: 195
Speed: 28
Time to make (on a world speed two): 9 mins 32 seconds
Defense: 7 blunt, 8 sharp, 2 distance
Hoplites:
Wood:0
Stone: 150
Silver: 75
Total resources required: 225
Speed:12
Time to make (on world speed two): 10 mins 58 seconds
Defense: 18 blunt, 12 sharp, 7 distance
Okay so slings are cheaper by 30 resources, not that much, and they take 1 min 26 seconds less. They are the worse possible for defense. About two times faster than hops.
Hops have a higher defensive value, meaning they would contribute more in an assault than slings and You would lose less hops in an attack than slings, normally. Plus most people build more swords than archers.
Would anyone care to give there opinions between slings and hops?