DeletedUser
Guest
You are probably confused because you're a little slow which is why you spend so much time posting every 2 min on the external forums usually the biggest trolls are the ones posting in forums more then logging into the game. MoS can spin it anyway they want if BoM took in players MoS was fighting in the same situation MoS would be crying about how much disrespect BoM showed blah blah blah. Let's look at the facts here...MoS is bored and was looking for a fight and tried to create a situation and MoS is already attacking me so there is a big shocker. All I can say is to the small teams and teams on the outside don't be wussies and ooh and aah over MoS's stats on paper. Seems as though Volsung is more interested in trying to bully you in diplomacy don't fall for it. So don't get tricked into deals where they will just cr ap on you later (remember everything is their short term gain and every deal the rug can get pulled out from under you) and take what they want later anyway. MoS said they already have this won so why do they need any deals, naps, pacts anyway...game on.
All alliances out there, what this kid tried to say is that if we accept some temporary agreements, that would mean that someday we might be quitting on them when we have no benefits from them anymore. He also means that if you're not pacted with us, then you might expect to be attacked someday sooner or later, and we only pact if we agree with the leaders of a pacting alliance on merging at some point. We never kept that in secret and it was rather obvious.
That particular NAP was created in order to benefit our both alliances. We no longer benefit from it - you still do, this is why you're so annoyed and so stupidly unreasonable about it. Why can't you understand that we were never pacted with you.
As for BoM taking in players MOS fought without letting us know with an active NAP which terms would refuse you to do so, then damn right I'd call you traitors and go for a war with you. On the other hand, if you did let us know that you were going to do, and quit on NAP if we refused to agree on that take over, so you might take these guys without breaking the NAP after all - we'd simply go for a war to protect our interests, but we would def. not call you traitors whining the way you do - don't judge people by yourself. What you do now is not protecting your interests (remember that situation about jackals retreating in silence when a lion appears?), but crying calling us traitors when in fact in terms of diplomacy we acted flawlessly and did everything right in an honorable way. That tremendous difference you kids just don't see and I'm giving up explaining it to you any further.
Last edited by a moderator: