DeletedUser
Guest
Hello all, seeing as the original thread was put on ice I decided to do a new 1..aint I a nice guy
So all the talk now is about inactive members..
I was wondering, what DoA was expecting us to do? Allow them just to take OUR cities, in our heartland? I think not, if we did not you guys would, so that is not a "statagey" but common sense. I am sure at some stage you guys would have done the same in your own heartland..
As for the war, yeah, it seems to have been come a slugg it out match, and the true winners of this will be the alliance that has most active and capable members ( us lol)
any way, I would ask that any posts in this thread be kept to bussiness and fun..no insults or accusations of 1 thing or another. Hope to hear from you all..
enjoy the game, and remember IT is a game
yours...kamikazebomber
So all the talk now is about inactive members..
I was wondering, what DoA was expecting us to do? Allow them just to take OUR cities, in our heartland? I think not, if we did not you guys would, so that is not a "statagey" but common sense. I am sure at some stage you guys would have done the same in your own heartland..
As for the war, yeah, it seems to have been come a slugg it out match, and the true winners of this will be the alliance that has most active and capable members ( us lol)
any way, I would ask that any posts in this thread be kept to bussiness and fun..no insults or accusations of 1 thing or another. Hope to hear from you all..
enjoy the game, and remember IT is a game
yours...kamikazebomber