Pnp The Riots Way of Doing Things

DeletedUser46906

Guest
Deus, you're the biggest noob ever. What kind of CS attempt was this? I have never seen you build more than 40 LS. You're bad. 9193d4544025b8c3df36d40079e727ab.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser47721

Guest
huh? If it was destroyed than ok but the CS Bounced :eek: Are you sure you are not in prehistory?!!
 

DeletedUser30490

Guest
oh well i think i know who you are...that was relatively easy! :D
 

DeletedUser47981

Guest
Er, no. The two cities were from refugees. I can also confirm that we have had no plans of any kind to attack you guys in the near or further future widely spread in our alliance. Perhaps in leadership they were considering it, but we had no plans of any kind spread to the alliance members.

I'm not leadership.

Exactly; Your leadership was planning it. Ask them if it's true if they deny it message me in game for proof.
 

DeletedUser11886

Guest
But it was not widely told to the majority of the alliance, unlike what your leaders did.
 

DeletedUser47981

Guest
Either way your leadership was planning an OP to back stab EPIC. All we did was confirm and wait for NR to strike first.
 

DeletedUser11886

Guest
We didn't even strike first. It was against a refugee lol.
 

DeletedUser30490

Guest
for the Love of God!!! he wasn't a refugee!!!! he had been with us for almost 2 weeks.Refugee rule expires in48 hours max!
 

DeletedUser47981

Guest
You do know your alliance member Alexxaros took a EPIC city during the pact? That was strike number 2. Then your buddy domj0323 took a EPIC city which makes strike number 3.

Oh well no point in explaining any longer. If your leadership keeps you and your alliance members in the dark I feel sorry for you.
 

DeletedUser47836

Guest
You do know your alliance member Alexxaros took a EPIC city during the pact? That was strike number 2. Then your buddy domj0323 took a EPIC city which makes strike number 3.

Yes, i took an EPIC II city during the pact. It was a city of 1.8k points that was inactive for 18 days before i sieged it.

As for the so called "EPIC city" that domj0323 took i personally had my own CS in it because this player was taking so damn long to go through with his reservation and the city was convenient. When i saw his CS coming in i pulled out. It needed 4 hours to arrive and that city was still Brothers of War and not EPIC... Probably poor Rebecca had no idea how she was going to be used...

If i had the slightest doubt about what happened it's crystal clear now after this statement of EPIC's very leader. Funnily enough, you only chose to mention my name after i had already quit the game, whilst it's been a long while i took this city.
Perhaps you thought i wouldn't check the forums???

Just on a side note. Despite the city being inactive for so long i still asked about it... Which shouldn't matter anyways to begin with, since that city was essentially a ghost.
 

DeletedUser30490

Guest
inactive for 18 days or not a pact is a pact and you CANNOT take pact members cities!!!
 

DeletedUser47836

Guest
inactive for 18 days or not a pact is a pact and you CANNOT take pact members cities!!!

I expected better from you. But i guess your position is such that makes such a statement necessary. If you choose to resort to such trivial arguments after correctly avoiding doing so all this time, you will only hurt your individual credibility which was damn high up to this point.

If you guys want to use a ghost as an excuse you can do so. Bottom line is this is getting lower and lower.

You could have used all this time much more efficiently. It will not be too long since this clash of egos will have irreversible effects.
Mistakes where made from both sides and what is happening is to no one's benefit. It is clear that you don't have as much time as you think you do.
 

DeletedUser30490

Guest
I'm honestly done arguing about this anymore. we know we didn't start anything and if you guys think the same lets leave it at that.Let the in game CS's take care of the rest.
What is clear is that all that NR cares is taking 1-2 cities by ctacking them sky high with birs and LDU and getting Titans revenge to try do some damage for them.Which they are failing btw.Their leader does not even know how to escort a CS,who send a CS with 6 LS?

anyways i'm done with this topic!
 

DeletedUser47836

Guest
You are making the mistake of assuming that i support NR in this "dispute" which is reasonable of course. You are also making the mistake of assuming i am trying to argue with you.

Indeed, stacking these sieges so much is in fact a mistake. It leaves other parts vulnerable. Also stacking only about 1.5k DLU in a siege towards an enemy that has reportedly done use of Griffin and Manticore nukes in the past was also a mistake.

What you may not realize is that i have no interest in arguing with you or proving anyone "right" or "wrong". That is especially true since i hold great respect in your diplomatic capabilities Druvi and i truly admire the intelligent way you have been presenting your case.

What i was talking about was winning the server. And if that happens to be what you guys truly want, that is not the way to go about it.

What these "CS's" are accomplishing is getting you both farther and farther away from this goal.
 

DeletedUser30490

Guest
I agree with you andalex i'm not arguing with you wither what i'm trying to say is this all started with ruardt and ivericus's decision.Even I don't see the point really of this war the stage where we are right now is just a dead end.Having to hit NR core which is obviously well defended.It wpuld be great to go onto win the server with some of NR players i got to agree there but I don't see how we anyone can turn back now.What has been done is done,there is no un-doing it and like you said both alliances made mistakes it's a matter of trying to see it though these mistakes now
 

DeletedUser47836

Guest
I have personally sent 109 LS to the stupid siege in Argos (was a member of Cecidus Angelus at that point) and i have been in talks with this great player well before he joined EPIC. I will not quote anything he said to me since i never got permission to do so.

If a certain player, no mater his position, has made a terrible mistake, it is your obligation, if you want to consider yourselves good players and "winners" to isolate this player and find reason where it can be found.

Otherwise you will lose, and that's all there is to it.
 
Top