Care to share?I love people interpreting war score without having any real idea what's happening.
Fact is.. 71 cities handed off to two handed to them but shadies "are the nappers/pacters" lol, they can interpret that any way they wish.. FACT is right there..Care to share?
Well I was willing to give him a chance to explain but all right.Fact is.. 71 cities handed off to two handed to them but shadies "are the nappers/pacters" lol, they can interpret that any way they wish.. FACT is right there..
Hahhahaha wait lemme use your logic real quickWhy is everyone being so mean to our danzel in distress?
Here you go @princess Kuini .. wipe those tears. Don't listen to these haters.. you may be getting thrashed by the banda but remember that epic moment when you destroyed that alliance in 55.. I forgot their name now but uhh, oh well - Keep your chin up!
View attachment 14421
I love people interpreting war score without having any real idea what's happening.
Hahhahaha wait lemme use your logic real quick
View attachment 14422
You may be getting THRASHED by the Odins, but remember that epic moment when you destroyed VICTRIX 7 worlds ago. Now that was epic.
But, three cities is everything to play for?View attachment 14423
Three more cities ey? This looks like a loss to me! Really no reason to play anymore as they clearly have won the war with this Huuuuuuge lead.
Meme? Did you not read what i said? " Hahhahaha wait lemme use your logic real quick " This is the point i'm making my guy.....Four cities is getting thrashed.
But, three cities is everything to play for?
to be fair shady's advantage over banda is pretty significant (in the same way sons is over TF). The fact that neither of these alliances are getting shredded is a testament to the skills of the players involved.Meme? Did you not read what i said? " Hahhahaha wait lemme use your logic real quick " This is the point i'm making my guy.....
Also why leave out this with your quote?
Its not like there are more factors then overall city losses vs cities gained lmao .
You're good bro.to be fair shady's advantage over banda is pretty significant (in the same way sons is over TF). The fact that neither of these alliances are getting shredded is a testament to the skills of the players involved.
I apologise for missing the context
nah. Drill was just looking into the futureYou're good bro.
And i am not dicrediting anyone fair play to the russians they play well together and are organizied, but to look at stats and get the idea " you may be getting thrashed by the banda" is just laughable
96-67 consider the number of players, please)Meme? Did you not read what i said? " Hahhahaha wait lemme use your logic real quick " This is the point i'm making my guy.....
Also why leave out this with your quote?
Its not like there are more factors then overall city losses vs cities gained lmao .
I think it's a bit more complicated than that.to be fair shady's advantage over banda is pretty significant (in the same way sons is over TF). The fact that neither of these alliances are getting shredded is a testament to the skills of the players involved.
I apologise for missing the context