Top 12 by Yossy Bossy with hair so glossy you want to stick your fenix into it

1saaa

Strategos
At the sake of debating the Titanic on the grepo externals ( :p ) - health and happiness disappeared when they hit the iceberg. Although I will agree with you on the luck when boarding thing. As, I'm not sure on the exact details, but I believe they lied about how many life rafts and the engineering of the ship itself when getting approved for it ( excuse my lack of appropriate technical terms ) ... so yes, the luck disappeared when they boarded, but ignorance is bliss, and I'm sure the passengers where healthy and happy all the way up to the crash into an iceberg.
Apart from the 3rd class passengers stuck in the bottom decks and shared a room with 3 other guys :p
 

1saaa

Strategos
Considering I've only ever seen one of them on the externals, I think you have no idea what you're talking about. Stick to sending fake attacks. Your real ones have just as much impact anyway.
The fake attacks that took hundreds of cities from your alliance?
 

Sorin Markov

Phrourach
The fake attacks that took hundreds of cities from your alliance?
Double alliance multi-world victors with a few noobs vs first-world MRA with a few good players :thonk:

I won't deny that you guys have a lot of good players. Captain Pudding is not one of them, he's as soft as his name. He's taken two cities that weren't internals or inactives and has fewer ABP than me, a backliner, despite being on the offensive (and winning) side.
 

NutsNBoltz

Strategos
Double alliance multi-world victors with a few noobs vs first-world MRA with a few good players :thonk:

I won't deny that you guys have a lot of good players. Captain Pudding is not one of them, he's as soft as his name. He's taken two cities that weren't internals or inactives and has fewer ABP than me, a backliner, despite being on the offensive (and winning) side.

remember when you were a frontliner? kek

Pudding is new, he's learnin, he's just a baby boy. Maybe he should also learn to talk smack after he decimates his enemies, not before or he just makes us look bad :eyes:
 

Captain Pudding

Hipparchus
Double alliance multi-world victors with a few noobs vs first-world MRA with a few good players :thonk:

I won't deny that you guys have a lot of good players. Captain Pudding is not one of them, he's as soft as his name. He's taken two cities that weren't internals or inactives and has fewer ABP than me, a backliner, despite being on the offensive (and winning) side.
I joined this world just over a month ago, started deep in 34. Definitely a lot of better players than me in Fiasco. However you got most of your BP from getting annihilated by Fiasco, whilst I don’t get attacked, see the difference ? Also I’d like to note that I’m about to overtake you on ABP when I’ve been here 3-4 months less than you. However you’re correct , I’m not a good player, but neither are you.

also I see you also only take internals and inactives so why are commenting on that?
 
Last edited:

Sorin Markov

Phrourach
I joined this world just over a month ago, started deep in 34. Definitely a lot of better players than me in Fiasco. However you got most of your BP from getting annihilated by Fiasco, whilst I don’t get attacked, see the difference ? Also I’d like to note that I’m about to overtake you on ABP when I’ve been here 3-4 months less than you. However you’re correct , I’m not a good player, but neither are you.

also I see you also only take internals and inactives so why are commenting on that?
Because I'm a backliner. I'm not meant to get flashy ABP. I'd also like to see the basis for "getting annihilated by Fiasco" on a personal level, considering how much BP I made compared to how much I lost. I've made BP at almost a 6-1 ratio. As long as you're doing that, it really doesn't matter how many cities you lose because you can replace each one with two more.
Yeah, I see the difference. You joined the biggest squad you could find and let them carry you while I've tried to make something happen.
 

DeletedUser54755

Guest
Because I'm a backliner. I'm not meant to get flashy ABP. I'd also like to see the basis for "getting annihilated by Fiasco" on a personal level, considering how much BP I made compared to how much I lost. I've made BP at almost a 6-1 ratio. As long as you're doing that, it really doesn't matter how many cities you lose because you can replace each one with two more.
Yeah, I see the difference. You joined the biggest squad you could find and let them carry you while I've tried to make something happen.
6-1 Ratio not sure where you getting these numbers from mate
 

Captain Pudding

Hipparchus
Because I'm a backliner. I'm not meant to get flashy ABP. I'd also like to see the basis for "getting annihilated by Fiasco" on a personal level, considering how much BP I made compared to how much I lost. I've made BP at almost a 6-1 ratio. As long as you're doing that, it really doesn't matter how many cities you lose because you can replace each one with two more.
Yeah, I see the difference. You joined the biggest squad you could find and let them carry you while I've tried to make something happen.
I didn’t ask to join Fiasco, I made a comment on forum and they liked it so they invited me lmao.

also you’ve lost 26 cities to Fiasco, and you have 30 now, so I think it’s fair to say you got wrecked lol
 

TromboneTom

Strategos
Because I'm a backliner. I'm not meant to get flashy ABP. I'd also like to see the basis for "getting annihilated by Fiasco" on a personal level, considering how much BP I made compared to how much I lost. I've made BP at almost a 6-1 ratio. As long as you're doing that, it really doesn't matter how many cities you lose because you can replace each one with two more.
Yeah, I see the difference. You joined the biggest squad you could find and let them carry you while I've tried to make something happen.
How can you be proud of losing city's get a grip lol loser you are a prime example of why we walked all over Sons of Odin get a fucking backbone haha
 

Ro deschain

Phrourach
Because I'm a backliner. I'm not meant to get flashy ABP. I'd also like to see the basis for "getting annihilated by Fiasco" on a personal level, considering how much BP I made compared to how much I lost. I've made BP at almost a 6-1 ratio. As long as you're doing that, it really doesn't matter how many cities you lose because you can replace each one with two more.
Yeah, I see the difference. You joined the biggest squad you could find and let them carry you while I've tried to make something happen.


What was that line people kept posting from legion C? guys friends buddy's.....

Sorin was all gleeful about having cities in our core and taking on fiasco, now all of a sudden he's a lowly backline player....probs cause he knows he will be loosing all those cities in the coming days and here comes the excuses of "well if I really wanted to defend those cities then you never would gave gotten them" ahahahahaha
 

Sorin Markov

Phrourach
6-1 Ratio not sure where you getting these numbers from mate
I've gained 300k BP and lost 50k units. That's a 6-1 ratio.

How can you be proud of losing city's get a grip lol loser you are a prime example of why we walked all over Sons of Odin get a fucking backbone haha
Because I'm making over three slots for each city I lose. I can lose cities all day and still grow faster and larger with those kinds of numbers.

What was that line people kept posting from legion C? guys friends buddy's.....

Sorin was all gleeful about having cities in our core and taking on fiasco, now all of a sudden he's a lowly backline player....probs cause he knows he will be loosing all those cities in the coming days and here comes the excuses of "well if I really wanted to defend those cities then you never would gave gotten them" ahahahahaha
I don't understand this comment. What does Legion C have to do with this? Why does my being a backline player have to do with my cities in your core? Why would anyone in the world expect me to keep cities in your core? I've made it clear that their purpose is getting BP and that they've done it well. You guys feed colony ships and OLU nukes basically unescorted on the daily.
 

TromboneTom

Strategos
Because I'm making over three slots for each city I lose. I can lose cities all day and still grow faster and larger with those kinds of numbers.
And you are exactly the reason why Sons fell so quickly, lazy defenders who make up excuses hey im sorry i lost this city on an all Blue island but i got atleast two slots out of it, just let me get some of these internals!!!!!
 
Top