Lol what? How do we come into it???
The same thing could be said about you guys, btw did you mange to pull your support before we broke the siege?just because we have seen you supporting their sieges. I can manipulate these things just like deluded charlie. Take your alliance out and the conquests remain the same.
The same thing could be said about you guys, btw did you mange to pull your support before we broke the siege?
On the Piggies seige you were supporting heavily.on what?
On the Piggies seige you were supporting heavily.
Little update, 2 more cities of goats in siege now, 32 4 shortly,
He had many new players early on, he is slowly getting his group to smaller numbers of better players, but goats are sitting here trying to add DL to the stats on their war with us, no idea why. We are not DL, we have a common enemy in goats, and its not even like DL is holding sieges for us. We are doing that fully on our own, just like DL has recently been taking a few cities from the goats, fully on their own. The only thing we help them with is we occasionally help to break sieges for them because it lowers goats DLU, which in term benefits us.Humanie is neither a new player or new leader. Would think he'd be able to do okay with the Dark Lords.
Little update, 2 more cities of goats in siege now, 32 4 shortly,
But hey, they are really giving it to Dark Lords! Lets not forget about that now give them credit there, showing they can pick on newer players cant argue there.
He had many new players early on, he is slowly getting his group to smaller numbers of better players, but goats are sitting here trying to add DL to the stats on their war with us, no idea why. We are not DL, we have a common enemy in goats, and its not even like DL is holding sieges for us. We are doing that fully on our own, just like DL has recently been taking a few cities from the goats, fully on their own. The only thing we help them with is we occasionally help to break sieges for them because it lowers goats DLU, which in term benefits us.
I have not a single clue why anyone would think we are accountable for their choices or cities. So why would you add their cities to stats against JFL? No reason other than to try and hide the fact we are completely dominating an enemy that was at one point nearly 9x our size and 6x our city count.
DL will be a force soon enough, they cut a lot of deadweight and are making some islands, I like the way the play which is why we have helped them out, but in no way are we helping them like mart is trying to make people think. He sits around acting like we are a sister alliance, I don't understand it... but hey no problem for us, real players who have an understanding of the game will understand the true stats of the war, gotta run now have to go rename a city I just took from another goat.
Martinus, it doesn't matter how you try to dress up the numbers; the fact is you seem incabable of dealing with JFL. Charlie is comparing his alliance with your 2 branches and while you seem incabable of taking their cities they seem to be taking yours at will. Now I appreciate there will be all kinds of inactives or whatever in there but really, rather than the constant bs you are feeding us on here about how they aren't making you look stupid (they are) why don't you just deal with them? You have the numbers so rather than trying to doctor the stats to stop you all looking inept change them by actually taking some of their cities.
They will have pacts/naps (everybody does) but nobody is buying this "we're not losing to JFL because we're taking cities of their mates" cr*p because anyone with 2 eyes and half a brain can see it's not true.
So try less talking on here, more ops in game.
Martinus, it doesn't matter how you try to dress up the numbers; the fact is you seem incabable of dealing with JFL. Charlie is comparing his alliance with your 2 branches and while you seem incabable of taking their cities they seem to be taking yours at will. Now I appreciate there will be all kinds of inactives or whatever in there but really, rather than the constant bs you are feeding us on here about how they aren't making you look stupid (they are) why don't you just deal with them? You have the numbers so rather than trying to doctor the stats to stop you all looking inept change them by actually taking some of their cities.
They will have pacts/naps (everybody does) but nobody is buying this "we're not losing to JFL because we're taking cities of their mates" cr*p because anyone with 2 eyes and half a brain can see it's not true.
So try less talking on here, more ops in game.
Well given that you are breaking JFL seiges I see your comment for the glittering example of impartiality it always is ..You talk about Charlie's alliance wins over Martinus 2 breaches, but you don't talk about them who help Charlie's alliance to break and stack sieges. Very good comment from you