TOP 8 BAttle Statistics

DeletedUser54360

Guest
TOP SIX Battle stats BP/ TOTAL Points RANKING HIGHEST FIRST

1 Last OF the RIMLORDS

2 NOOBS

3 WIB

4 SMYN

5 CAUSTIC

6 TINAD





You can make of it what you will . But this is the actual position .
 

DeletedUser37020

Guest
I don't usually post on external forums as it's usually just people shooting off their mouth without really knowing what they're talking about. But I can't really take the display of incompetence/laziness by simply posting alliance bp per point like it means something on it's own. Let's at least do a little bit of work and try to paint a better picture. I've done some leg work and expanded on WHG's verbose posting above.

Attack BP
Attack Rank, Alliance, Points,ABP, Attack Ratio
1, SMYN, 21064077, 11234206, 0.53
2, CS, 21447222, 9063838, 0.42
3, Noobs, 9756842, 3773577, 0.39
4, THINAD, 15547504, 5429645, 0.35
5, LOTRL, 6525073, 1896313, 0.29
6, WIB, 17062416, 4606022, 0.27

Defense BP
Defense Rank, Alliance, Points, DBP, Defense Ratio
1, LOTRL, 21064077, 3222678, 0.49
2, Noobs, 15547504, 3146722, 0.32
3, WIB, 21447222, 3648824, 0.21
4, SMYN, 9756842, 2548257, 0.12
5, CS, 17062416, 1702357, 0.08
6, THINAD, 6525073, 1140667, 0.07

Total BP
BP Rank, Alliance, Points, BP, Total Ratio
1, LOTRL, 6525073, 5118991, 0.78
2, Noobs, 9756842, 6920299, 0.71
3, SMYN, 21064077, 13782463, 0.65
4, CS, 21447222, 10766195, 0.50
5, WIB, 17062416, 8254846, 0.48
6, THINAD, 15547504, 6570312, 0.42

And most importantly. How many cities are you taking or losing. Because BP doesn't mean squat unless you are putting it to work.

City Gain Rank, Alliance, Points, Takes, Loses, Internals, Take/Loss Ratio
1, SMYN, 21064077, 1425, 68, 403, 20.95
2, THINAD, 15547504, 1214, 101, 164, 12.01
3, CS, 21447222, 1602, 208, 231, 7.70
4, Noobs, 9756842, 641, 100, 125, 6.41
5, WIB, 17062416, 961, 231, 164, 4.16
6, LOTRL, 6525073, 396, 354, 150, 1.12

Note: CS, THINAD, and WIB all have sister alliances so their city takes and loses will be elevated thus throwing off their ratio. Their ratios would likely be better if filtering out swaps with their sister alliances.

None the less, this paints a better picture than just by looking at overall BP. And that picture shows that LOTRL is nothing more than a punching bag. You're gaining lots of DBP and losing cities. The high amount of DPB at the cost of your cities is putting you at the top of your overall BP per points ranking. A player could get rimmed and have 100k dbp because of it and only end up with a 1k city. His 100k bp to 1k in points would make him the best player in grepo based on WHG's simplistic but severely flawed rating system (I'd expect better from someone with such a high IQ...I guess IQ isn't everything). I've also uploaded an Image of this data which will show it formatted better.
 

Attachments

  • nagadios_analysis.png
    nagadios_analysis.png
    34.5 KB · Views: 9
Last edited by a moderator:

destroxxi

Phrourach
I don't usually post on external forums as it's usually just people shooting off their mouth without really knowing what they're talking about. But I can't really take the display of incompetence/laziness by simply posting alliance bp per point like it means something on it's own. Let's at least do a little bit of work and try to paint a better picture. I've done some leg work and expanded on WHG's verbose posting above.

Attack BP
Attack Rank, Alliance, Points,ABP, Attack Ratio
1, SMYN, 21064077, 11234206, 0.53
2, CS, 21447222, 9063838, 0.42
3, Noobs, 9756842, 3773577, 0.39
4, THINAD, 15547504, 5429645, 0.35
5, LOTRL, 6525073, 1896313, 0.29
6, WIB, 17062416, 4606022, 0.27

Defense BP
Defense Rank, Alliance, Points, DBP, Defense Ratio
1, LOTRL, 21064077, 3222678, 0.49
2, Noobs, 15547504, 3146722, 0.32
3, WIB, 21447222, 3648824, 0.21
4, SMYN, 9756842, 2548257, 0.12
5, CS, 17062416, 1702357, 0.08
6, THINAD, 6525073, 1140667, 0.07

Total BP
BP Rank, Alliance, Points, BP, Total Ratio
1, LOTRL, 6525073, 5118991, 0.78
2, Noobs, 9756842, 6920299, 0.71
3, SMYN, 21064077, 13782463, 0.65
4, CS, 21447222, 10766195, 0.50
5, WIB, 17062416, 8254846, 0.48
6, THINAD, 15547504, 6570312, 0.42

And most importantly. How many cities are you taking or losing. Because BP doesn't mean squat unless you are putting it to work.

City Gain Rank, Alliance, Points, Takes, Loses, Internals, Take/Loss Ratio
1, SMYN, 21064077, 1425, 68, 403, 20.95
2, THINAD, 15547504, 1214, 101, 164, 12.01
3, CS, 21447222, 1602, 208, 231, 7.70
4, Noobs, 9756842, 641, 100, 125, 6.41
5, WIB, 17062416, 961, 231, 164, 4.16
6, LOTRL, 6525073, 396, 354, 150, 1.12

Note: CS, THINAD, and WIB all have sister alliances so their city takes and loses will be elevated thus throwing off their ratio. Their ratios would likely be better if filtering out swaps with their sister alliances.

None the less, this paints a better picture than just by looking at overall BP. And that picture shows that LOTRL is nothing more than a punching bag. You're gaining lots of DBP and losing cities. The high amount of DPB at the cost of your cities is putting you at the top of your overall BP per points ranking. A player could get rimmed and have 100k dbp because of it and only end up with a 1k city. His 100k bp to 1k in points would make him the best player in grepo based on WHG's simplistic but severely flawed rating system (I'd expect better from someone with such a high IQ...I guess IQ isn't everything). I've also uploaded an Image of this data which will show it formatted better.



Every leaders wet dream. Wheres my Ang3r :'(
smiley_emoticons_frown.gif
smiley_emoticons_frown.gif
smiley_emoticons_frown.gif
smiley_emoticons_frown.gif
smiley_emoticons_frown.gif
smiley_emoticons_frown.gif
smiley_emoticons_frown.gif
smiley_emoticons_frown.gif
 

DeletedUser54360

Guest
I don't usually post on external forums as it's usually just people shooting off their mouth without really knowing what they're talking about. But I can't really take the display of incompetence/laziness by simply posting alliance bp per point like it means something on it's own. Let's at least do a little bit of work and try to paint a better picture. I've done some leg work and expanded on WHG's verbose posting above.

Attack BP
Attack Rank, Alliance, Points,ABP, Attack Ratio
1, SMYN, 21064077, 11234206, 0.53
2, CS, 21447222, 9063838, 0.42
3, Noobs, 9756842, 3773577, 0.39
4, THINAD, 15547504, 5429645, 0.35
5, LOTRL, 6525073, 1896313, 0.29
6, WIB, 17062416, 4606022, 0.27

Defense BP
Defense Rank, Alliance, Points, DBP, Defense Ratio
1, LOTRL, 21064077, 3222678, 0.49
2, Noobs, 15547504, 3146722, 0.32
3, WIB, 21447222, 3648824, 0.21
4, SMYN, 9756842, 2548257, 0.12
5, CS, 17062416, 1702357, 0.08
6, THINAD, 6525073, 1140667, 0.07

Total BP
BP Rank, Alliance, Points, BP, Total Ratio
1, LOTRL, 6525073, 5118991, 0.78
2, Noobs, 9756842, 6920299, 0.71
3, SMYN, 21064077, 13782463, 0.65
4, CS, 21447222, 10766195, 0.50
5, WIB, 17062416, 8254846, 0.48
6, THINAD, 15547504, 6570312, 0.42

And most importantly. How many cities are you taking or losing. Because BP doesn't mean squat unless you are putting it to work.

City Gain Rank, Alliance, Points, Takes, Loses, Internals, Take/Loss Ratio
1, SMYN, 21064077, 1425, 68, 403, 20.95
2, THINAD, 15547504, 1214, 101, 164, 12.01
3, CS, 21447222, 1602, 208, 231, 7.70
4, Noobs, 9756842, 641, 100, 125, 6.41
5, WIB, 17062416, 961, 231, 164, 4.16
6, LOTRL, 6525073, 396, 354, 150, 1.12

Note: CS, THINAD, and WIB all have sister alliances so their city takes and loses will be elevated thus throwing off their ratio. Their ratios would likely be better if filtering out swaps with their sister alliances.

None the less, this paints a better picture than just by looking at overall BP. And that picture shows that LOTRL is nothing more than a punching bag. You're gaining lots of DBP and losing cities. The high amount of DPB at the cost of your cities is putting you at the top of your overall BP per points ranking. A player could get rimmed and have 100k dbp because of it and only end up with a 1k city. His 100k bp to 1k in points would make him the best player in grepo based on WHG's simplistic but severely flawed rating system (I'd expect better from someone with such a high IQ...I guess IQ isn't everything). I've also uploaded an Image of this data which will show it formatted better.
 

DeletedUser54360

Guest
Good JOB .

I did say make of it what you will and you have.

I am going to suggest that city numbers will only be important until LOTR starts taking them .

Survival and maintaining fighting strength is more important than city numbers. Several Allainces in much rosier starting positions than ours are already gone. We are still here on the rebound and yes starting to take cities. The unending stream of aneathma directed at me does not deflect from the fact we can fight and make the best of a situation that could and has broken others.

If you can fight and can get into an Ocean like 63 cities are picked up like shelling peas our current thriving good health means less than what we already achieved. ( TO ME NATURALLY ) But now we get some of the easy city gains that others hav ehad access to.

There is no flaw in my analysis the best fighters are the best fighters -

Remind me the last time I insulted you or questioned your ability or cast aspersions about your character.. When was that my even handed impartial sanguine friend??
 

Noz The Greek

Phrourach
Good JOB .

I did say make of it what you will and you have.

I am going to suggest that city numbers will only be important until LOTR starts taking them .

Survival and maintaining fighting strength is more important than city numbers. Several Allainces in much rosier starting positions than ours are already gone. We are still here on the rebound and yes starting to take cities. The unending stream of aneathma directed at me does not deflect from the fact we can fight and make the best of a situation that could and has broken others.

If you can fight and can get into an Ocean like 63 cities are picked up like shelling peas our current thriving good health means less than what we already achieved. ( TO ME NATURALLY ) But now we get some of the easy city gains that others hav ehad access to.

There is no flaw in my analysis the best fighters are the best fighters -

Remind me the last time I insulted you or questioned your ability or cast aspersions about your character.. When was that my even handed impartial sanguine friend??


so what you are saying, is, if you had tried to fight SMYN in 54, you would have been rimmed (likely) so you ran to 63, where there isn't the calibre of fighting previously experienced in 54 - so you will survive because you are strong there? Rembrandt couldn't have pained a rosier picture - (and your roses would be yellow)
 

DeletedUser54360

Guest
so what you are saying, is, if you had tried to fight SMYN in 54, you would have been rimmed (likely) so you ran to 63, where there isn't the calibre of fighting previously experienced in 54 - so you will survive because you are strong there? Rembrandt couldn't have pained a rosier picture - (and your roses would be yellow)


I didn't say any of that - you said all of that. Motivation unknown but again neither rational or objective.
 

Noz The Greek

Phrourach
I didn't say any of that - you said all of that. Motivation unknown but again neither rational or objective.

Hmm, I was merely interpreting your post. Let me break it down so you understand.

Survival and maintaining fighting strength is more important than city numbers.
= run away to 63 where it is easier

If you can fight and can get into an Ocean like 63 cities are picked up like shelling peas
= run away into 63 as the opposition (according to you) is not of the same calibre of fight as in 54

Rembrandt, painted pictures - with a lot more accuracy than you (how you view your alliance)

Motivation: your arrogance and you mouth off a lot about how great you are,
There is no flaw in my analysis the best fighters are the best fighters
- not you though

Objective - nope - agree with you there, it is my opinion.
 

DeletedUser54360

Guest
It appears you are the one eager to mouth off in this case..
 

DeletedUser38168

Guest
noz leave him alone he will destroy you with all his dbp and then run away to some distant ocean and claim it as a great victory after losing countless city's but don't worry its all part of his plan
 

DeletedUser54360

Guest
yup, when a noob like you spouts off, I can't help it.
smiley_emoticons_baby_junge2.gif

NOZ Henceforth to be Nauseating NOZ

You encapsulate everything I hate in GREPO .

An (at best) mediocre player who takes it upon himself to use the term NOOB as an insult.


LOTR always have and always will be haters of NOOB HATERS ..

A NOOB being anyone who knows even marginally less than the pathetic virtually nothing that you know.

You my friend are the reason that a LOTR type of Alliance exists.

God Forgive Me but some of those we train do turn out bitter little yaps like you. But there have been many great successes.

World Points leader GREGFLINT IS GREAT for example. A NOOB to World points leader.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

AS for PHil we both know I have already won the argument about who is the better player.

No more needs to be said on the subject I didn't try to rub your nose it it but it is there for all to see.

After your merger news. What possible credibility can any of you have for further pontification on this torrid stage?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Bear > I am sorry to have ruined your scoop> that was not ,malicious on my part .

WG WUG Mad Hatter call me what you will I have the right of this argument..
 

Noz The Greek

Phrourach
NOZ Henceforth to be Nauseating NOZ

You encapsulate everything I hate in GREPO .

An (at best) mediocre player who takes it upon himself to use the term NOOB as an insult.


LOTR always have and always will be haters of NOOB HATERS ..

A NOOB being anyone who knows even marginally less than the pathetic virtually nothing that you know.

You my friend are the reason that a LOTR type of Alliance exists.

God Forgive Me but some of those we train do turn out bitter little yaps like you. But there have been many great successes.

World Points leader GREGFLINT IS GREAT for example. A NOOB to World points leader.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

AS for PHil we both know I have already won the argument about who is the better player.

No more needs to be said on the subject I didn't try to rub your nose it it but it is there for all to see.

After your merger news. What possible credibility can any of you have for further pontification on this torrid stage?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Bear > I am sorry to have ruined your scoop> that was not ,malicious on my part .

WG WUG Mad Hatter call me what you will I have the right of this argument..


Mission accomplished - my work here is done
 
Top