DeletedUser41566
Guest
Some mates suggested I should advertise my project here as well.
Myself:
I have been in The Others in Phi, Rave and Dovahkiin Rising in Zakros and Los Sanchez in Lindos. Have been among top fighters in all these alliances (In Zakros also in top three of the world), have helped to lead them as well. No records though as I deleted accounts, but something can be found when google-ing for buffered history.
I am active, aggressive and dedicated player, and communicative and efficient leader.
From my past experience I developed a quite clear idea about how an alliance should look like. Further down I try to describe the idea the best way possible.
The alliance:
- values invidualism and common sense. Basically, every member is free to do as he/she likes, provided he/she does apply a great amount of common sense prior every action. The principle is: do not bite a larger bit than you can swallow.
Members are expected to run mostly on their own, not purely rely on alliance's support and resources. Those, who are not able to do anything w/o alliance helping them with troops, ships, resources or diplomacy, are not tolerated and welcomed. Yet it does not mean that alliance denies its support completely, it does mean that asking for support must be saved for occasions where it is absolutely necessary. To say it short: no leeches.
- does have one guiding principle: efficiency. Max results with min effort. Thus, no diplomacy, no NAPs, unions, early wars to revenge for "what they said about our Shawn", etc, unless in cases when it is absolutely necessary.
Too much diplomacy and too many moral obligations will lead to inefficient use of alliance's power and resources, and eventually wear people off too much too early. I have witnessed that in several occasions.
- does not fancy too complex hierarchy. Positions in the alliance will not be gained in return for one small favour or just being on the right place at the right time, they are gained with overall performance and continous show of skills necessary for leader. Overall, there will not be many leadership positions at all - 3-5 for starters.
- does fancy members who do not need constant leading and guidance. No ultimate control of every aspect of alliance's life will be applied. Initiative is encouraged, members are expected to handle their daily matters on their own.
At the same time, when the alliance will not dictate its members everyday actions, there will be no large-scale democracy as well, that is voting each decision and let the majority to decide, as it is very unefficient way to run an alliance. See above about efficiency.
The members:
Basically, three requirements:
- above average intelligence
- activity
- communication (that includes everyday usage of skype)
Playing style does not matter - the alliance needs both aggressive and defensive-minded players.
Previous playing experience in conquest world is a plus, but not a requirement. I am ready to accept in few beginners and revolt world players - if they are intelligent and active enough and also communicate (see 3 requirements above), they should learn the basics pretty quickly.
If interested, PM me. If we are interested, I will reply and provide further details.
Myself:
I have been in The Others in Phi, Rave and Dovahkiin Rising in Zakros and Los Sanchez in Lindos. Have been among top fighters in all these alliances (In Zakros also in top three of the world), have helped to lead them as well. No records though as I deleted accounts, but something can be found when google-ing for buffered history.
I am active, aggressive and dedicated player, and communicative and efficient leader.
From my past experience I developed a quite clear idea about how an alliance should look like. Further down I try to describe the idea the best way possible.
The alliance:
- values invidualism and common sense. Basically, every member is free to do as he/she likes, provided he/she does apply a great amount of common sense prior every action. The principle is: do not bite a larger bit than you can swallow.
Members are expected to run mostly on their own, not purely rely on alliance's support and resources. Those, who are not able to do anything w/o alliance helping them with troops, ships, resources or diplomacy, are not tolerated and welcomed. Yet it does not mean that alliance denies its support completely, it does mean that asking for support must be saved for occasions where it is absolutely necessary. To say it short: no leeches.
- does have one guiding principle: efficiency. Max results with min effort. Thus, no diplomacy, no NAPs, unions, early wars to revenge for "what they said about our Shawn", etc, unless in cases when it is absolutely necessary.
Too much diplomacy and too many moral obligations will lead to inefficient use of alliance's power and resources, and eventually wear people off too much too early. I have witnessed that in several occasions.
- does not fancy too complex hierarchy. Positions in the alliance will not be gained in return for one small favour or just being on the right place at the right time, they are gained with overall performance and continous show of skills necessary for leader. Overall, there will not be many leadership positions at all - 3-5 for starters.
- does fancy members who do not need constant leading and guidance. No ultimate control of every aspect of alliance's life will be applied. Initiative is encouraged, members are expected to handle their daily matters on their own.
At the same time, when the alliance will not dictate its members everyday actions, there will be no large-scale democracy as well, that is voting each decision and let the majority to decide, as it is very unefficient way to run an alliance. See above about efficiency.
The members:
Basically, three requirements:
- above average intelligence
- activity
- communication (that includes everyday usage of skype)
Playing style does not matter - the alliance needs both aggressive and defensive-minded players.
Previous playing experience in conquest world is a plus, but not a requirement. I am ready to accept in few beginners and revolt world players - if they are intelligent and active enough and also communicate (see 3 requirements above), they should learn the basics pretty quickly.
If interested, PM me. If we are interested, I will reply and provide further details.
Last edited by a moderator:
The thing is that I cannot give exact number as a lot of people are still unsure, and I don't know should I count them in or not. But certainly would need some more, that's why I'm marketing the opportunity here.