DeletedUser
Guest
Well since the TOP12 Post has lost in Topic I will open up this post.
The moment what threw me off was this Post by the Leader of Tiny Teddies.
Sure thing, although I could be a spoilt brat? Again, mere generalisations.
On topic: Musketeers have taken 11 cities: 5 are from inactives(Pat & Svender), another 3 are from Uncle Bulgaria, and 3 from players too far away to effectively defend (Marcfury & Urban Fudge).
Well done guys.
I do not understand you Cheez. As a Leader and as an Alliance every member has a high Value. You call us an Alliance with deadweight and still you have not taken more then 3 cities from us!
If we take a City whos Flag is a TT flag it your Job as a leader to prevent this from happening.
UncleB was TT when we took his city and it is because of your behavior that he did not accept you apologize and because of that he did the right choice and choosed the Alliance where all are fighting for one and one is fighting for all.
Then you state that we dumb and noobs and you proof that with reports. Who is the noob leader if he accepts Players fro to far away or lets theyr player take cities so far out? And then also you can put hundreds of Reports like this in here in the the End Musketeers lead in the War between them and TT with 10 to 3. So whos the noob now?
Members in your Alliance should really ask them self if the leadership has made the right calls and especially if the only way to remain number one atm is due to merges. Start taking cities to grow and stop merges. You cant even controll your members in TT yet but yeah sure always get more members in you have to deal with since you are a mastermind in dealing with people and making deaccessions planning attacks. Sorry I mean we are the Noobs in the End right?
TT 3
Musketeers 10 One for all, all for one
Caristoles
The moment what threw me off was this Post by the Leader of Tiny Teddies.
Sure thing, although I could be a spoilt brat? Again, mere generalisations.
On topic: Musketeers have taken 11 cities: 5 are from inactives(Pat & Svender), another 3 are from Uncle Bulgaria, and 3 from players too far away to effectively defend (Marcfury & Urban Fudge).
Well done guys.
I do not understand you Cheez. As a Leader and as an Alliance every member has a high Value. You call us an Alliance with deadweight and still you have not taken more then 3 cities from us!
If we take a City whos Flag is a TT flag it your Job as a leader to prevent this from happening.
UncleB was TT when we took his city and it is because of your behavior that he did not accept you apologize and because of that he did the right choice and choosed the Alliance where all are fighting for one and one is fighting for all.
Then you state that we dumb and noobs and you proof that with reports. Who is the noob leader if he accepts Players fro to far away or lets theyr player take cities so far out? And then also you can put hundreds of Reports like this in here in the the End Musketeers lead in the War between them and TT with 10 to 3. So whos the noob now?
Members in your Alliance should really ask them self if the leadership has made the right calls and especially if the only way to remain number one atm is due to merges. Start taking cities to grow and stop merges. You cant even controll your members in TT yet but yeah sure always get more members in you have to deal with since you are a mastermind in dealing with people and making deaccessions planning attacks. Sorry I mean we are the Noobs in the End right?
TT 3
Musketeers 10 One for all, all for one
Caristoles
