Who do you think would win?
They seem pretty even based off of grepostats. I didn't play this world long enough to get to know too many people, mostly newbies on the rim.
Wansyth
More points
Lower City Average (Can be interpreted as a positive or negative, honestly depends on playing style; however, it can be typically said a lower average is better as there is more population available).
Support of a much larger alliance (Still not a perfect positive, plenty of situations where this doesn't help much).
Has only ever lost one city.
Dyames
74,000 more abp
382,000 more dbp (Open to interpretation)
Has the support of a much more concentrated group of players (Just like before, this may not always benefit this hypothetical showdown).
Has lost eight cities.
Keeping in mind they started playing this world around the same time, i'd say they're very evenly matched; and have support from above average alliances.
The amount of resources involved with Wanysth's 117 cities involves a lot more leeway for mistakes against Dyames's 82 cities; and judging from their almost equal abp, i'd say they'd perform equally well at attacking each other. Dyames however does have a considerably large dbp, but I don't know the situation on how it was earned- I don't know whether it sheds a good light on how well he can defend, or on how well he cooperates with a very supportive alliance. If this hypothetical fight were to go on though, and without support from their respective alliances, i'd have to say Wansyth would win. They just seem too evenly skilled at the game for Dyames to overcome his disadvantage in resources.