WARS of Mu

DeletedUser18317

Guest
and i very much doubt a stalemate, in GW we stick together pride ourselves on coordination and team work with lots of activity, trust me IEL will fall at the hands of GW, there is no way they can compare to us with a leader like kidfab running them, he is the reason the war started and will cause them more trouble than good
 

DeletedUser

Guest
I can't say I know much about either other then GW have been around doing their thing for a while now and stats show they do work well as a tight unit.

I am putting my vote in early that GW will pound them
 

DeletedUser18317

Guest
Greek Warfare ABP rank 3rd, alliance rank 5th

IEL ABP rank 17th, alliance rank 13th

things dont look good for IEL Do they even know how to attack, and there DBP rank is even worse 24th

look like a bunch of players that take inactives, only good thing about IEL is there player average :(
 

DeletedUser

Guest
IEL are a bunch of experienced players! The alliance ABP starts when the alliance is formed this does not reflect the ABP of each player which is high. Greek Warfare is a hardcore alliance I think this will be a good fight.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
IEL are a bunch of experienced players! The alliance ABP starts when the alliance is formed this does not reflect the ABP of each player which is high. Greek Warfare is a hardcore alliance I think this will be a good fight.
Actually to be fair:
- Main player, Flooder, 291,272 points, 140,936 bp, 79,869 abp.
- 2nd player, rainer 63, 220,828 points, 49,087 bp, 41,537 abp.
- 3rd player, Simplee, 164,560 points, 19,348 bp, 14,580 abp
- checking http://www.grepostats.com/world/en12/alliance/8507/members?compare=kill_att shows that from 25 members 11 haven't attacked anything in the past week. 44% of the whole alliance. And that 2 of them have got under 300 abp, probably attacking the crows on the wall. Raising the toll of non-combatants to 52%
- checking http://www.grepostats.com/world/en12/alliance/8507/colonizations?page=0 shows that from the last 20 colonizations 15 have been on abandoned or dead players. that's 75%. and 2 on 1-man alliance of under 15K. That leaves only 3 remaining hero fights, one in which they lost a town to GW. And from the remaining 2 just check the players they took them from.

Moreover:
- 2 of rainer's attacks were including 190 respectively 240 swords
- 1 nogate's attack had 2 times more birems than ls. another one 10 birems escorting 200 slingers. And another with 5 birems escorting 107 swords, 121 slinger, 82 hops and 94 archers.


If the above shows they are experienced, then i helped showing how much experience they have.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser

Guest
IEL are a bunch of experienced players! The alliance ABP starts when the alliance is formed this does not reflect the ABP of each player which is high. Greek Warfare is a hardcore alliance I think this will be a good fight.

IEL, i don't rate them never thought they should have been persued by Cerberus. GW will either take over or absorb them.
watch nat merge into br it their only solution to their major problems.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
GW will get the most conquers but IEL will most likely survive for now. Its been 7 days since the last conquer so I think maybe GW is sleeping or IEL is turtling.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
That war is over!! It was a rouge player that was given a little power while the leader went on vacation that started it. Now that player is being internally conquered, and all actions have stopped. Lets talk about an alliance that is in two wars now. TCE seems to be at war with two alliances at the moment. To their west the fight LOA, and seem to be wiping the floor with them at the moment. To their east they fight with The Grey Ghosts, and while little progress has been made it is currently a four to nothing war with TCE on top. Not bad I say for a little alliance to be holding their own against to bigger rivals. Perhaps soon we will see them in the top five as they have already moved up in rank 5 spots in the past month, and in ABP 3 spots. Time will tell!!! :pro::pro:
 

DeletedUser

Guest
^^ Yeah how many of those were inactives and how long ago was that. I checked grepstats and saw like two 3 pages in.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Hey it is still a city won!! How many have you guys got off us 0!!!! We will see I will say you guys are good, and i will take nothing away from you. The facts are the facts inactives or not!! Like I said we will see my friend time will tell.
 

DeletedUser18317

Guest
i personally dont like to take inactives when we are in a war with an alliance, its shows noithing about your alliance at all, any alliance can take inactives, try and take out the biggest players 1st then make the alliance crumble than take the inactives, thats the way we do it at GW :)
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Fighting R.Madrid is practically fighting the five people who play. No point in attacking them.
 

DeletedUser18317

Guest
sharkboy how in earth do you even count R.Madrid as inactive, he is probally the most active player in MU and you say inactive, sharkboy take you and your alliance and go try and do an operation like GW, go and play farmville on FB you noob

we have took him from 1st to 2nd and we are only starting you noob nooob noob noob, yeah you have annoyed me you noob,
 
Top