This thread is fun. Everybody trashing each other and no one talks about wars
Truer words were never spoken on the forum.Everybody pretends to hate the spy tactic but most will take the opportunity to move one into your parking lot if the chance comes up. Spies are a big part of the game and will continue to be so.
What are Hydras doing?
get ur facts straightSeems like so many alliances decided to sim to the WW...
Some really funny shayt.
We're not fighting Triad or EoD, so I really don't understand where that came from. We're losing to IO since they have a much stronger presence in O54 compared to us.Don't assume, find me on OoZ. Proms are one more that are simming, forgot about them.
Ok if hydras that good: "Why are you guys loosing to Triad,EoD,IO(god damnit)..."?
I was wondering which DF was going to come out all cocky first.Yeah, and Oracle shows you lost more cities to triad and EoD than you took from them(7-3 I think).
The IO had bigger presence in o35, now we are the strongest alliance in it. And they can't take one active city from us.
Don't know situation in alliance, but you guys aren't growing as fast as your size alliance should.
I'm one of two DF members that are active on the forum.I was wondering which DF was going to come out all cocky first.
He got a major point here. Now, I'm not really one to talk, since I got big mostly by staying as far away from the front lines as I can possibly get, but we've been having problems with IO getting uppity along the 55/54 border latley, and it's getting pretty nasty out here.Must've thought you were with us Herpus.
I won't bother denying Hydra should be doing better. We should. However, you cannot say that IO had a strong presence in 35. They recruited members from a dying alliance. They may have had the numbers, but certainly not the skill, co-ordination or activity to go with it.
If we compare those who you fought in 35 to those who we're fighting in 54, like Simmmer, Garydam, BRROSE3BOYS, paulf41, etc, who do you think would seem better?