DeletedUser
Guest
Okay, so we are finishing up a minor front (little conquests to be fair) a lot of our guys were away. Now they are back and set up, with no more inactive to eat up we are applying pressure blah blah. and because the said alliance got an early start on our inactives, the "score" was in their favour. Now we there are no more inactives their count dwindled. Now to maintain that score, they are kicking every guy and claiming it is to annoy me. Anyway back story to my question. ( and incase anyone jumps on) this isn't about that alliance. What I want to know is:
In the wars of Epsilon now, do we see winning a war as the tally of conquests shown in grepostats as winning
Or
Is winning advancing on position, making the enemy lose ground, forcing their players to quit or leave said alliance?
*This isn't a personal alliance thread, just a discussion on views. so no arguments*
In the wars of Epsilon now, do we see winning a war as the tally of conquests shown in grepostats as winning
Or
Is winning advancing on position, making the enemy lose ground, forcing their players to quit or leave said alliance?
*This isn't a personal alliance thread, just a discussion on views. so no arguments*