DeletedUser11965
Guest
If . 9 . Is made again...haha xD, who were the original members. I can't believe I turn them down back then, I'm such a noob.
I like a little banter on my opinions, actually I kinda prefer that others do reply against my opinions As long as the other can keep it on a cival level. It is when the other makes it personal that I find it gone to far. But fun banter definatly makes the forums fun to read
i looked for you in this world, and it appears you are not here,banter is easier when you arent playing in the worlds you banter in
i looked for you in this world, and it appears you are not here,banter is easier when you arent playing in the worlds you banter in
I know how it feels! It's like when I lost a city to "two alliances"especially when you didnt feel the need to have another alliance help
Numbers and diplomacy are both valid tools, you argue that we not use them precisely because they are effective? Riiiiiight. Dont get me wrong, I realize how it can be exciting to be the underdog in a fight, but that doesnt mean I'm gonna go out of my way to be one.
Fool is all I can say to that, the fact that you can outnumber somebody and use that against them is just a part of the game. If you want to play using bad strategy then thats fine by me.
I definitely think a win is worth more when your outnumbered and outgunned, I just dont agree with purposefully ignoring diplomacy for the sake of getting yourself in that position. I think its cooler if that kind of situation occurs naturally.
As the fact is this is a game, so play it on a level that makes it fun for you.