DeletedUser48096
Guest
Jonny, Where does GM mention my Name and say that he is talking about my BP?....
Everybody knew that Nate was running a duel account.. Well Except maybe you it appears. But Nate was doing that on his own back, If he was banned for it he would have only himself to blame for it. You knew your city names were skating a fine line Jonny as you had already been reported for it once and if you were banned a second time then you have only yourself to blame for it. Also Jonny as Iam aware the process of banning players starts whenever the mods get to the reading the report against the player. It might be a few hours after the complaint was submitted. As a result it is more than likely that the attacks were sent after the complaint was filed against you.
Plus it is rather arrogant of you to assume your attacks would have made that much of a differnce considering every other attack splatted...
Clearly if you had been doing an investigation against me for either Grepo support or Inno it would be a major conflict of interests since you are currently playing in this world and currently on an opposition side to me, As a result it would be impossible to accept such an investigation as it would blatanly contain a bias perspective against me. Plus as we both know froggy Grep support dont allow mods to both play and police the same worlds for that very reason.
Also assume all you want but Jamo had that fake admission for ages before raising it. If it was too late as you say and had I actually been doing something wrong then it would be his own fault for not bringing the issue up sooner....
You are welcome to be skeptical of this and I realize Iam skating a fine line on what I can say but the issue of Dan Haag wasnt even raised in my appeal against my ban. I won't be sharing the appeal text obvious reasons but now clearly this confirms my side of the story that while I was banned, I was not banned for Dan Haag as you froggy even acknowledge that too much time had elapsed for me to be banned for that had I been actually doing what Iam accused of. So once again... Prove it Jonny, Or shut up Jonny....
Also Froggy Statistical Analysis is by defintion..... Statistical... and therefore entirely based on numbers and probabilities, So again Iam curious to know what "Statistical" evidence you have. Since this investigation is against me there would therefore be little harm in sharing the investigation with me since it clearly was a waste of time as it was too late by your own admission.
Jonny said:So should withholding the knowledge of someone running a dual account. GGN you just admitted that you knew about it when Nate was doing it and said nothing and Red has admitted he knew about it as well. As for saving up any messages isn't it just as bad to report someone for city names that they have had for well over a year just as they are about to launch attacks on one of your wonder island cities. One that would have, without doubt, been taken if the attacks had been launched.
Everybody knew that Nate was running a duel account.. Well Except maybe you it appears. But Nate was doing that on his own back, If he was banned for it he would have only himself to blame for it. You knew your city names were skating a fine line Jonny as you had already been reported for it once and if you were banned a second time then you have only yourself to blame for it. Also Jonny as Iam aware the process of banning players starts whenever the mods get to the reading the report against the player. It might be a few hours after the complaint was submitted. As a result it is more than likely that the attacks were sent after the complaint was filed against you.
Plus it is rather arrogant of you to assume your attacks would have made that much of a differnce considering every other attack splatted...
Frogstomp said:I did the back work and the investigation and the only reason GGN was not permanently ban was because too much time had lapsed on the server after his initial admission to prove my findings (under existing reformed rules) which were extensive, irrefutable and founded in solid statistical analysis.
Clearly if you had been doing an investigation against me for either Grepo support or Inno it would be a major conflict of interests since you are currently playing in this world and currently on an opposition side to me, As a result it would be impossible to accept such an investigation as it would blatanly contain a bias perspective against me. Plus as we both know froggy Grep support dont allow mods to both play and police the same worlds for that very reason.
Also assume all you want but Jamo had that fake admission for ages before raising it. If it was too late as you say and had I actually been doing something wrong then it would be his own fault for not bringing the issue up sooner....
You are welcome to be skeptical of this and I realize Iam skating a fine line on what I can say but the issue of Dan Haag wasnt even raised in my appeal against my ban. I won't be sharing the appeal text obvious reasons but now clearly this confirms my side of the story that while I was banned, I was not banned for Dan Haag as you froggy even acknowledge that too much time had elapsed for me to be banned for that had I been actually doing what Iam accused of. So once again... Prove it Jonny, Or shut up Jonny....
Also Froggy Statistical Analysis is by defintion..... Statistical... and therefore entirely based on numbers and probabilities, So again Iam curious to know what "Statistical" evidence you have. Since this investigation is against me there would therefore be little harm in sharing the investigation with me since it clearly was a waste of time as it was too late by your own admission.
Last edited by a moderator: