DeletedUser10962
Guest
Ah yes the old it's a nap not a pact defence. I believe many of the same people used the same logic in Carphi when we were under too much pressure.
Besides ZFG explicitly claimed no other diplomacy so even a NAP is against their own rules. They're probably running into a common problem with playing this way. If you try to play with no diplo and have lots of good aggressive players who all expand out at some point you open up too many fronts for no diplo to be viable.
Besides ZFG explicitly claimed no other diplomacy so even a NAP is against their own rules. They're probably running into a common problem with playing this way. If you try to play with no diplo and have lots of good aggressive players who all expand out at some point you open up too many fronts for no diplo to be viable.